Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

05:55
Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain
Published on: October 13, 2023
Population-scale network embeddings expose educational divides in network structure related to right-wing populist
Malte Lüken1,2,3, Javier Garcia-Bernardo4,5, Sreeparna Deb6
1Netherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.luken@esciencecenter.nl.
Scientific Reports
|July 8, 2026
Summary
Machine learning embeddings from population networks predict right-wing populist voting. Network structure differences in education are linked to voting patterns, offering interpretable insights.
Area of Science:
- Social Network Analysis
- Computational Social Science
- Political Science
Background:
- Administrative registry data enables population-scale network construction reflecting shared social contexts.
- Machine learning can encode these networks into numerical representations (embeddings) capturing individual positions.
- Previous research has not fully explored the interpretability and predictive power of such embeddings for social outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To create interpretable, population-scale network embeddings for the Dutch population.
- To assess the predictive power of these embeddings for right-wing populist voting.
- To investigate the link between network structures, particularly educational ties, and voting behavior.
Main Methods:
- Constructed a population-scale social network from administrative data across five contexts (neighborhood, work, family, household, school).
- Generated network embeddings for all individuals using machine learning techniques.
- Utilized embeddings and individual characteristics to predict right-wing populist voting, followed by embedding transformation and analysis.
Main Results:
- Network embeddings alone predicted right-wing populist voting above chance but less effectively than individual characteristics.
- Combining embeddings with individual characteristics yielded only marginal improvements in prediction.
- After transformation, one embedding dimension strongly correlated with voting, revealing that educational ties and attainment differences correspond to distinct network structures associated with this voting pattern.
Conclusions:
- Population-scale network embeddings can be rendered interpretable, offering insights into social phenomena.
- Structural differences in educational networks are significantly associated with right-wing populist voting.
- This study demonstrates a novel methodological approach linking social network structure to political behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Group Polarization
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
In- and Out-Groups
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Conservative Vector Fields
A conservative vector field describes a force or field in which the work done between two points depends only on the initial and final positions. For a ball moving in Earth’s gravitational field, gravity performs work determined by the difference in height, regardless of whether the ball moves vertically or follows a curved trajectory.A vector field is conservative if it can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar potential function, f. In two dimensions, this is written...
Social Exchange Theory
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Exchange Theory
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
The Representativeness Heuristic
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
