Population-scale network embeddings expose educational divides in network structure related to right-wing populist

Malte Lüken1,2,3, Javier Garcia-Bernardo4,5, Sreeparna Deb6

  • 1Netherlands eScience Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.luken@esciencecenter.nl.

Scientific Reports
|July 8, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Machine learning embeddings from population networks predict right-wing populist voting. Network structure differences in education are linked to voting patterns, offering interpretable insights.

Related Concept Videos

Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
Conservative Vector Fields01:29

Conservative Vector Fields

A conservative vector field describes a force or field in which the work done between two points depends only on the initial and final positions. For a ball moving in Earth’s gravitational field, gravity performs work determined by the difference in height, regardless of whether the ball moves vertically or follows a curved trajectory.A vector field is conservative if it can be expressed as the gradient of a scalar potential function, f. In two dimensions, this is written...
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.