Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

A Guide to Concentration Alternating Frequency Response Analysis of Fuel Cells
Published on: December 11, 2019
Parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells using enhanced Fourier transform optimizer with adaptive
Ramakrishna Raghutu1, Tummala S L V Ayyarao2, G Sasikumar3
1Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, GMR Institute of Technology (GMRIT) (Deemed to be University), Rajam, Andhra Pradesh, 532127, India. ramakrishna.r@gmrit.edu.in.
None:
The seven unknown parameters in the Amphlett semi-empirical proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) model are critical to accurate performance prediction, system design, and degradation diagnosis. Gradient-based methods are often unreliable in this context because the sum-of-squared-errors (SSE) objective is highly nonlinear and multimodal, while existing population-based approaches tend to exhibit substantial run-to-run variability. To address these challenges, this paper proposes the Enhanced Fourier Transform Optimizer (EFTO), a hybrid adaptive algorithm that combines a success-history differential evolution branch with elite-guided mutation and a covariance-adaptive sampling branch, dynamically balanced through an online branch-selection mechanism. On the IEEE CEC 2017 benchmark suite (28 functions, D = 50, 30 independent runs), EFTO achieved a Friedman rank of one with an average rank of 1.607 and a Wilcoxon p ≤ 1.17 × 10⁻3 against six competing algorithms. A supplementary comparison with three recognized state-of-the-art solvers found no statistically significant performance differences relative to two of the three solvers (p > 0.05), while EFTO recorded the lowest average runtime of 8.653 s. When applied to three commercially validated PEMFC stacks, EFTO achieved machine-precision reproducibility, with a standard deviation below 10⁻14 V2 across 30 independent runs and best SSE values of 2.0656 V2 (NedStack PS6), 1.0564 V2 (AVISTA SR-12), and 0.8139 V2 (Ballard Mark V). These results were statistically confirmed by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (R⁺ = 465, p = 1.73 × 10⁻⁶). Component wise ablation showed that the covariance-adaptive sampling mechanism was the most influential component, with removal of the covariance-adaptive sampling mechanism causing a 98.7% degradation in SSE (p = 1.09 × 10⁻24). Stack-specific sensitivity analysis further demonstrated that the identified parameters remain physically consistent with the electrochemical operating regime of each stack, establishing EFTO as a competitive and consistent tool for PEMFC parameters identification on the evaluated benchmark configurations.
Related Concept Videos
Batteries and Fuel Cells
Microbial Fuel Cells
Turnover Number and Catalytic Efficiency
Chymotrypsin is a pancreatic enzyme that breaks down proteins during digestion. The...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
