Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
A methodological assessment and reflection on member checking as a form of participant validation for conservation
Judith J Rakowski1, Trong Dat Cao Tien2, Trung Cao Tien2
1Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Abstract:
Qualitative approaches are increasingly applied in conservation social science, yet methodological reflection remains limited. Member checking, a process of returning findings to participants for feedback, is widely recognized outside conservation as a means to enhance rigor and reciprocity, but it is rarely reported in conservation research. This paper assesses and reflects on the implementation of member checking within a participatory study on conservation crime prevention in Pù Mát National Park, Vietnam. The member checking process involved 18 sessions with 88 participants representing community members, park staff, nongovernmental organizations, and university researchers. Member checking was used to revisit and refine preliminary interpretations of data collected during previous fieldwork phases. Findings indicated that the process strengthened credibility, confirmability, dependability, and transferability of results while fostering transparency, accountability, and mutual learning. Challenges related to linguistic diversity, power asymmetries, and logistical constraints revealed limits to its universality as a validation tool. The greatest value of member checking for conservation social science lies not in confirming truth but in fostering iterative dialogue, reflexivity, and shared understanding. Approached as a form of participatory reflection, member checking can help bridge methodological rigor and ethical practice, contributing to more equitable and context-sensitive conservation social science research. We offer practical recommendations for integrating member checking into conservation projects and helping translate principles of reflexive and participatory research into conservation practice.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Naturalistic Observations
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification