Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
Risk of Recall Among Plastic Surgery Devices Cleared Through the FDA 510(k) Pathway
Background:
The FDA 510(k) pathway is the predominant route by which medical devices reach the US market. Previous studies have examined recall risk across broad FDA panels, but none have characterized plastic surgery devices or compared recall patterns across subcategories within the field.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to determine the rate and severity of FDA recalls among 510(k)-cleared plastic surgery devices, compare recall risk across subcategories, and benchmark against all other 510(k) devices.
Methods:
All 510(k)-cleared devices (2008-2023) were obtained from the FDA premarket notification database. Two reviewers classified 234 surgery panel product codes, identifying 103 plastic surgery codes (3194 devices) in 8 subcategories. Each device was matched to the FDA recall database by its 510(k) number. All remaining 510(k) devices (n = 45,182) served as comparator. Recall rates were compared using χ2 tests and risk ratios (RR); time to first recall was modeled with Cox proportional hazards regression with Bonferroni correction.
Results:
Of 3194 plastic surgery devices, 197 (6.2%) were recalled, including 11 Class I recalls (0.3%). The recall rate for all other 510(k) devices was 11.4% (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47-0.62; P < .001). After Bonferroni correction, 4 subcategories had elevated recall hazard vs lasers and energy: implants and fixation (hazard ratio [HR], 3.64), negative pressure wound therapy (HR, 2.53), surgical mesh and acellular dermal matrices (HR, 2.46), and wound closure (HR, 2.01).
Conclusions:
Plastic surgery 510(k) devices had a lower recall rate than nonplastic surgery devices, although risk varied substantially across subcategories. These data provide a specialty-specific baseline for postmarket device surveillance.
Level Of Evidence 5 Therapeutic:
For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
Insights
Plastic surgery devices cleared by the FDA 510(k) pathway had lower recall rates than other devices. However, specific subcategories like implants and wound closure showed increased recall risks.
Area of Science:
- Medical device regulation
- Plastic surgery
- Regulatory science
Background:
- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) pathway is the primary route for medical device market entry.
- Prior research on FDA recall risk has not specifically focused on plastic surgery devices or their subcategories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess FDA recall rates and severity for 510(k)-cleared plastic surgery devices.
- To compare recall risks among plastic surgery subcategories.
- To benchmark plastic surgery device recall risk against all other 510(k) devices.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of FDA premarket notification (510[k]) database from 2008-2023.
- Classification of 234 surgical panel product codes to identify 103 plastic surgery codes (3194 devices) across 8 subcategories.
- Matching devices to the FDA recall database via 510(k) number and comparing with 45,182 other 510(k) devices.
- Statistical comparison using chi-squared tests, risk ratios, and Cox proportional hazards regression with Bonferroni correction.
Main Results:
- A total of 197 (6.2%) plastic surgery devices were recalled, with 11 (0.3%) being Class I recalls.
- The overall recall rate for other 510(k) devices was 11.4% (Risk Ratio [RR] = 0.54).
- Elevated recall hazards were identified in implants and fixation (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 3.64), negative pressure wound therapy (HR = 2.53), surgical mesh/acellular dermal matrices (HR = 2.46), and wound closure (HR = 2.01) subcategories compared to lasers and energy devices.
Conclusions:
- Plastic surgery devices exhibit a lower overall recall rate compared to non-plastic surgery devices.
- Significant variations in recall risk exist across different plastic surgery subcategories.
- This study establishes a crucial specialty-specific benchmark for postmarket surveillance of plastic surgery devices.
Related Concept Videos
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
FDA Approved Drugs: Changes to Approved Drugs
Clinical Trials: Overview