Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
Systematic bias in point-of-care INR testing: comparative analysis of Abbott and Roche devices
Sandya Arunachalam1, Tony Badrick1, Emmanuel J Favaloro2,3,4,5
1Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs (RCPAQAP), St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
Objectives:
Point-of-care (POC) International Normalised Ratio (INR) testing provides rapid anticoagulation monitoring. Still, it is susceptible to systematic bias, particularly at supratherapeutic levels, which can lead to inappropriate warfarin dose adjustments and increased thrombotic risk. This study evaluated bias trends between Abbott and Roche POC INR devices.
Methods:
Bias trends were assessed using Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Programs survey data (2023-2025), in-house verification, and patient sample comparisons against laboratory instrument testing used as a comparative reference mark (Werfen ACL TOP).
Results:
Abbott PT INR cartridges demonstrated a shift from negative bias in 2023 to pronounced positive bias in 2024, with discrepancies most evident at INR >4.0. The introduction of Abbott PT Plus cartridges in 2025 significantly reduced bias, achieving near alignment with Roche CoaguChek Pro II and laboratory methods tested in this study. Comparative reagent analysis highlighted the influence of thromboplastin source and ISI values on harmonisation.
Conclusions:
Findings reinforce the need for confirmatory venous testing when POC INR exceeds critical thresholds, and emphasise the importance of ongoing performance monitoring, structured escalation policies, and transparent communication with manufacturers.
Related Concept Videos
01:24Automated Microbial Diagnostics
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
01:25Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.