Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Beyond discrimination: calibration and decision utility are required before GREAT can guide individual ECT decisions
Juan Carlos Munguia1, Yolly Molina1, Patricia Soriano2
1Faculty of Medical Sciences, https://ror.org/03xyve152National Autonomous University of Honduras, Honduras.
None:
Belz and colleagues present GREAT, a seven-item clinical instrument for predicting electroconvulsive therapy response in unipolar depression, with promising discriminatory validity (AUC 0.841). We identify three methodological gaps - absent calibration, limited sample representativeness and unquantified incremental value - that must be addressed before GREAT can guide individual clinical decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Halo Effect
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Dosage Regimen: Individualization