Predictors of Revision Surgery to Promote Bone Healing After Surgical Fixation of Pilon Fractures

Anthony L Wilson1, Robin M Litten, James E Darnley

  • 1From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Wilson, Litten, Patch, McGwin, Johnson, Spitler), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Darnley), Summa Health, Akron, OH, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Boyd), Montefiore Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

Insights

Revision surgery to promote bone healing (RPBH) is needed for one in seven pilon fracture patients. Fracture-related infection is the strongest predictor of RPBH, while medial column fixation reduces the need for revision surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Trauma surgery
  • Bone healing research

Background:

  • Pilon fractures are severe injuries with significant soft-tissue damage.
  • Impaired bone healing often necessitates revision surgery to promote bone healing (RPBH).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify factors associated with RPBH after surgical fixation of pilon fractures.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective cohort study of 349 adult patients with pilon fractures (AO/OTA 43).
  • Compared demographic, injury, surgical, and postoperative characteristics between patients with and without RPBH.
  • Statistical significance defined as P < 0.05.

Main Results:

  • 13.8% of patients required RPBH.
  • Open fractures and higher BMI were more common in the RPBH group.
  • Fracture-related infection (FRI) was the strongest predictor of RPBH (OR = 11.17).
  • Medial column fixation was associated with reduced odds of RPBH (OR = 0.41).

Conclusions:

  • One in seven patients needed RPBH after pilon fracture fixation.
  • Minimizing infection risk and optimizing medial stability may improve healing outcomes.
  • FRI is the strongest predictor of RPBH, while medial column fixation reduces RPBH odds.
Abstract