Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

A Test Bed to Examine Helmet Fit and Retention and Biomechanical Measures of Head and Neck Injury in Simulated Impact
Published on: September 21, 2017
A Head of the Curve: Investigating Helmet Therapy Compliance in Patients With Craniosynostosis
Racquel Lyn1, Anthony Basta, Christopher Williams
1Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX.
Insights
Helmet therapy compliance is crucial after endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis. Younger surgery age and fewer days between visits correlate with better adherence, potentially improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurosurgery
- Cranial Surgery
- Orthotics and Prosthetics
Background:
- Helmet therapy is essential for cranial molding post-endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC).
- Limited data exists on factors influencing compliance with helmet therapy.
- Understanding compliance factors can inform surgical planning and family counseling for infants with sagittal craniosynostosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with helmet therapy compliance in infants with sagittal craniosynostosis.
- To identify predictors of adherence to postoperative helmet treatment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 48 infants with nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis undergoing ESC and helmet therapy (2015-2024).
- Exclusion of patients with open cranial vault reconstruction or other craniosynostosis types.
- Collection of demographic, socioeconomic, morphometric, and helmet therapy variables; compliance defined as completing therapy and attending >90% of follow-up visits.
Main Results:
- 83.3% of patients were compliant (CP) with helmet therapy.
- CP patients underwent surgery at a younger age (3.0 vs. 4.0 months) and had fewer days between helmet visits (7.6 vs. 9.5 days).
- Noncompliant (NC) patients were more likely to require secondary surgery (25% vs. 0%).
Conclusions:
- Preoperative counseling addressing adherence barriers can guide surgical planning and improve helmet therapy compliance.
- Families with significant logistical and socioeconomic challenges may benefit from considering alternative surgical options.
- Younger age at surgery and consistent follow-up are associated with better helmet therapy adherence.
Background:
Adherence to helmet therapy is critical for achieving optimal cranial molding following endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC). Limited data exist on factors influencing compliance, which may inform surgical planning and family counseling. This study evaluated clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with helmet therapy compliance in infants with sagittal craniosynostosis.
Methods:
A retrospective review was performed of patients with nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis who underwent ESC with postoperative helmet therapy between 2015 and 2024. Patients with open cranial vault reconstruction or other craniosynostosis types were excluded. Demographic, socioeconomic, morphometric, and helmet therapy variables were collected. Compliance was defined as completing therapy and attending >90% of follow-up visits. Patients were classified as compliant (CP) or noncompliant (NC). Statistical analysis was performed in R with significance set at P<0.05.
Results:
Of 48 patients, 40 (83.3%) were CP and 8 (16.7%) NC. Median age at surgery was 3 months; 77.1% were male, and 62.5% had private insurance. CP patients underwent surgery at a younger age (3.0 versus 4.0 mo, P=0.038) and had fewer days between helmet visits (7.6 versus 9.5, P=0.004). No differences were observed in insurance, race, distance, or therapy duration. Morphometric outcomes were similar between groups. NC patients were more likely to require secondary surgery (25% versus 0%, P=0.012).
Conclusion:
Additional preoperative counseling that addresses potential adherence barriers may help guide surgical planning and improve outcomes for helmet therapy compliance. Families facing greater logistical and socioeconomic challenges may benefit from alternative surgical options.
More Related Videos
08:03Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
07:47Personalized 3D-printed Headgear for Multi-electrode Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
Published on: September 9, 2025