Related Experiment Videos
Traffic rule-embedded decision-making for automated vehicles in pedestrian-vehicle conflicts via deep reinforcement
Chenming Fu1, Xuesong Wang1, Ruolin Shi1
1College of Transportation, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China; The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 201804, China.
None:
In pedestrian-vehicle crossing conflicts, automated vehicles (AVs) should avoid collisions and follow pedestrian-related traffic rules and social expectations. However, many existing decision-making models mainly optimize safety or efficiency. The behavioral effects of specific pedestrian-related rules remain insufficiently examined. Thus, actions that appear safe under surrogate metrics may still violate normative expectations in dynamic traffic. This study proposes a Traffic Rule-Embedded Decision-Making framework (TRE-DM) for ego-vehicle control in pedestrian-vehicle conflicts. 1) Pedestrian-related provisions from traffic laws and standards are decomposed into yielding, slowing, and braking. 2) These rules are formalized using MTL-informed triggering conditions and embedded into reinforcement learning through soft rule-shaped rewards. 3) The framework is evaluated using pedestrian-crossing conflicts reconstructed from the Shanghai Naturalistic Driving Study. Perturbation-based stress tests and external evaluations on three public datasets are also conducted. Results show that TRE-DM achieves balanced performance in safety, compliance-related behavior, comfort, and efficiency. Compared with human-driver trajectories, it reduces TIT (time-integrated TTC) by 37.5% and decreases yielding violations from 102 to 0. Compared with the agent using only collision-avoidance objectives, it reduces TIT by 32.2% and decreases collision events from 7 to 0. Ablation results further show that yielding is essential for reducing safety-critical failures, slowing supports earlier risk anticipation, and braking improves control smoothness. Trajectory reconstruction further shows earlier deceleration and safer lateral clearance under rule guidance, suggesting more rule-consistent and risk-aware evasive behavior. Overall, this study provides an interpretable rule-modeling and rule-embedding framework for improving AV behavior in pedestrian-vehicle conflicts.
Related Concept Videos
Collisions in Multiple Dimensions: Problem Solving
A small car of mass 1,200 kg traveling east at 60 km/h collides at an intersection with a truck of mass 3,000 kg traveling due north at 40 km/h. The two vehicles are locked together. What is the...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Rolling Resistance: Problem Solving
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example: