Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Detecting Attention Levels in Students
Published on: December 15, 2023
ACADPro: XAI-student procrastination classification in academia using optuna optimized machine learning models
V Jalaja Jayalakshmi1, M Punithavalli2
1Department of Computer Applications, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India, 641046. vjalaja79@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Academic procrastination plays a substantial role in determining the achievements of students. This study develops a novel framework that would allow data-driven academic decisions. This study proposes a reliability-driven hyperparameter optimization framework that defines a composite optimization problem that incorporates discriminative capacity, predictive reliability, and falsified negative risks into a single framework. Another major aspect of this study is defining a prediction target labelled as engineered academic risk; this prediction target was created using structured behavioural and academic survey-based indicators. To avoid a circular and a leakage-resilient issue, preprocessing and feature selection were applied to ensure that input features were excluded from the constructed label. The goal combines ROC-AUC, a bootstrap-based stability measure of variance in the resampled data sets, and a risk-sensitive penalty that seeks to reduce the number of false alarms in identifying academically vulnerable students. Optimization of the hyperparameters utilized Optuna in stratified five-fold stratified cross-validation in order to ensure statistical robustness and reproducibility in the experiment. The experimental outcomes verify that all classifiers have a high predictive potential, with the Random Forest model showing the highest composite score of 0.9852 even as its ROC AUC stands at 0.9766, its accuracy at 92.15%, and its weighted F1-score at 0.9321, while logistic regression had a perfect recall, indicating sensitivity concerns. Statistical Significance Tests verified that the differences in the classifiers cannot be considered substantial, indicating that the reliability-focused optimization strategy was effective as opposed to a single classifier approach.