Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by identifying...
Auditory Perception01:17

Auditory Perception

The auditory system is essential for sound perception, utilizing various critical structures. When sound waves enter the outer ear, they travel through the ear canal and cause the eardrum to vibrate. These vibrations are then transmitted to the middle ear, where three tiny bones – the malleus, incus, and stapes – amplify the sound. This amplification is crucial, as it ensures that the sound vibrations are strong enough to be conveyed to the inner ear. These vibrations then reach the cochlea, a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human intracranial correlates of dynamic coding in auditory working memory.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Attention to Pseudotone Melodies Enhances Cortical But Not Brainstem Responses in Humans.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Function of the auditory cortex characterized by its intrinsic dynamic coactivation patterns estimated in individuals.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Reverberation exacerbates effects of interruption on auditory spatial selective attention.

JASA express letters·2026
Same author

Neuronal Representation of Auditory Distance Percepts vs. Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO·2026
Same author

A model of the reference frame of the ventriloquism aftereffect and saccade adaptation.

JASA express letters·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

Modality-dependent bottom-up attention and eye gaze direction affect auditory spatial discrimination.

René Šebeňa1, Jyrki Ahveninen2, Virginia Best3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, P. J. Šafárik University, Košice, Slovak Republic.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|July 9, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Valid auditory cues enhance spatial hearing, while visual cues do not. Brain activity suggests auditory information is converted to a visual reference frame for attention.

Keywords:
Auditory spatial discriminationBottom-up attentionCrossmodal perceptionEEG

More Related Videos

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:52

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition
07:14

A Method to Study Adaptation to Left-Right Reversed Audition

Published on: October 29, 2018

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:52

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Spatial Cognition

Background:

  • Understanding how the brain processes spatial information from different senses is crucial.
  • Investigating the interplay between auditory and visual cueing in spatial tasks provides insights into attentional mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the impact of intramodal (auditory-auditory) and crossmodal (auditory-visual) cueing on auditory spatial discrimination.
  • To identify the neural correlates of cueing effects using electroencephalography (EEG).
  • To determine the reference frame used for auditory spatial processing.

Main Methods:

  • Combined behavioral and EEG experiment with participants discriminating auditory target locations.
  • Auditory and visual cues varied in validity and modality across separate blocks.
  • EEG recorded to analyze neural responses, including N1, N2, P3, and ACOP components.

Main Results:

  • Valid auditory cues significantly improved auditory spatial discrimination sensitivity compared to invalid cues.
  • Visual cue validity did not affect discrimination performance.
  • EEG data revealed cue validity and modality modulated early auditory evoked potentials (N1, N2).
  • An auditory cue-evoked posterior contralateral positivity (ACOP) suggested an eye-centered (visual) reference frame for auditory attention.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory spatial information is processed using a visual, eye-centered reference frame, even when attention is directed by sound.
  • This suggests a conversion of auditory spatial signals into a visual representation for guiding attention.
  • Findings contribute to understanding multisensory integration and spatial attention mechanisms.