Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Comparative effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy after revascularization in diabetes and chronic
Cheng-Wei Lin1,2,3, Pi-Hua Liu1,4, Chia-Hung Lin1,2,5
1Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Insights
For patients with diabetes and chronic limb-threatening ischemia, aspirin plus cilostazol reduced risks of lower-extremity amputation and major adverse cardiovascular events compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiology
- Endocrinology
Background:
- Diabetes and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients have high risks of adverse limb and cardiovascular events.
- Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post-revascularization for CLTI remains uncertain.
- This study compared long-term outcomes of different DAPT strategies in this high-risk population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of different dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies.
- To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes including amputation, major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and mortality.
- To identify the optimal DAPT regimen for patients with diabetes and CLTI undergoing revascularization.
Main Methods:
- Nationwide 90-day landmark observational analysis using healthcare claims data.
- Included adults with type 2 diabetes and new-onset CLTI undergoing lower-extremity revascularization (2016-2019).
- Classified patients by post-procedural DAPT strategy; used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) for covariate balancing.
Main Results:
- Aspirin plus cilostazol was associated with significantly lower risks of lower-extremity amputation (LEA) and MACE compared to aspirin plus clopidogrel.
- Clopidogrel plus cilostazol showed reduced MACE but no significant limb benefit.
- All-cause mortality was similar across DAPT groups; cilostazol benefits were reduced in patients on dialysis.
Conclusions:
- Aspirin plus cilostazol appears to be a favorable DAPT strategy for reducing LEA and MACE in diabetic patients with CLTI.
- Clopidogrel plus cilostazol offers MACE reduction but not significant limb benefit.
- Further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.
Background:
Patients with diabetes and chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) face high risks of adverse limb and cardiovascular events. While post-revascularization dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is generally recommended, the optimal regimen remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different DAPT strategies with respect to long-term clinical outcomes.
Methods:
We conducted a nationwide 90-day landmark observational analysis informed by a target trial framework based on healthcare claims data from Taiwan. The cohort included adults with type 2 diabetes who underwent lower-extremity revascularization for new-onset CLTI between 2016 and 2019. Patients were classified according to the post-procedural DAPT strategy initiated within a 90-day grace period. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline covariates. The outcomes assessed were lower-extremity amputation (LEA), major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and all-cause mortality.
Results:
The final cohort comprised 1,849 patients (aspirin plus clopidogrel, n = 439; aspirin plus cilostazol, n = 753; clopidogrel plus cilostazol, n = 657). Median follow-up years (IQR) were 2.94 (1.97-4.11) for all-cause mortality, 2.79 (1.62-3.96) for LEA, 2.40 (0.98-3.62) for MALE, and 2.55 (1.24-3.70) for MACE. Following IPTW, baseline characteristics were well balanced. Compared with standard DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel), aspirin plus cilostazol was associated with a lower risk of LEA (sHR, 0.672; 95% CI, 0.460-0.981) and MACE (sHR, 0.799; 95% CI, 0.641-0.995). Clopidogrel plus cilostazol did not demonstrate significant limb-related advantages but was associated with a lower incidence of MACE (sHR, 0.790; 95% CI, 0.631-0.989). All-cause mortality was comparable across all three regimens. Notably, in stratified analyses, the clinical benefits of cilostazol-based therapies were attenuated and statistically non-significant among patients receiving dialysis.
Conclusions:
Among patients with diabetes and CLTI undergoing lower-extremity revascularization, aspirin plus cilostazol was associated with lower risks of LEA and MACE compared with aspirin plus clopidogrel, whereas clopidogrel plus cilostazol was associated with lower MACE but not with significant limb-related benefit. These observational findings suggest that aspirin plus cilostazol may be a favorable DAPT strategy for long-term outcomes in this population; however, further prospective randomized trials are warranted to verify.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation