Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data
Published on: January 16, 2019
Automating clinical history extraction for flow cytometry panel selection using an EHR-integrated large language
Rebecca Rojansky1, Timothy Keyes2, Jean Oak1
1Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Abstract:
Flow cytometry immunophenotyping is essential for diagnosing hematologic malignancies, but accurate antibody panel selection depends on clinical context that is often fragmented across the electronic health record (EHR). At our institution, clinical laboratory scientists (CLS) use a standardized decision-tree algorithm incorporating specimen characteristics, laboratory values, and prior diagnoses to select panels. This process requires manual review and synthesis of longitudinal clinical documentation and remains time-intensive. We evaluated whether ChatEHR-an institutionally developed, EHR-integrated large language model (LLM) platform-could automate clinical history extraction and support flow cytometry panel selection across 100 cases. Performance was compared with the current CLS-driven workflow using hematopathologist-reviewed panel selections as the reference standard. ChatEHR achieved comparable accuracy to CLS in extracting and categorizing prior hematologic diagnoses (78% vs. 78%). Average processing time was 20.3 s for ChatEHR versus 41 s for manual review, corresponding to an estimated annual reduction of approximately 120 staff hours. Direct panel selection accuracy was lower for ChatEHR (47% vs. 78%), primarily due to errors in deterministic protocol execution and structured data interpretation. Major error categories included incorrect decision-tree logic (39%), diagnostic conflation (22%), failure to retrieve or apply clinical history (22%), laboratory value misinterpretation (9%), and hallucination of nonexistent panels (7%). ChatEHR demonstrated strong performance in extracting and classifying clinical history but was less reliable for deterministic protocol execution and structured data interpretation. Integration of LLM-based clinical history extraction with rules-based laboratory algorithms provides a practical hybrid workflow that preserves diagnostic reliability while reducing manual chart review burden. This approach enables scalable automation while maintaining appropriate hematopathologist oversight in clinical flow cytometry workflows.
