Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Microelectrode Guided Implantation of Electrodes into the Subthalamic Nucleus of Rats for Long-term Deep Brain Stimulation
Published on: October 2, 2015
Deep brain stimulation battery longevity: a cohort study comparing impact of anaesthesia modality and anatomic target
Noor Zaghlula1,2, Kelsey Kinsman1, Oliver Phillips3
1Department of Surgery, Section of Neurosurgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Background:
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) treats various movement disorders, though routine battery replacement is required. Factors affecting battery life remain unclear; prior studies implicate programming parameters and device model. Advancements in intraoperative guidance enable DBS placement under general anaesthesia (GA) using direct targeting instead of conscious sedation (Monitored anesthesia care or MAC) using indirect targeting. This study examines the effect of DBS anaesthesia type on IPG battery longevity and other influencing factors.
Methods:
Retrospective chart review of 254 patients who underwent DBS placement between 2013 and 2023 at a tertiary care centre was completed under an IRB-approved protocol, 217 of whom met inclusion criteria. Using an accelerated failure time (AFT) model, battery longevity was assessed as a function of anaesthesia type, electrode location, stimulation parameters, diagnosis, demographics, Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III score (MDS-UPDRS-III) and battery type.
Results:
DBS implanted with MAC resulted in significantly reduced battery longevity, AFT coefficient=-0.149, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.03 (p<0.05) compared with GA. compared with globus pallidus interna, subthalamic nucleus implantation (AFT coefficient=0.223, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.35, p<0.05) and thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) implantation (AFT coefficient=0.134, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.26, p<0.05) were associated with significantly longer battery longevity. High amplitude settings significantly reduced battery longevity, AFT coefficient=-0.167, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.12 (p<0.05). Diagnosis, MDS-UPDRS-III score and battery model effects on IPG battery longevity were not statistically significant.
Conclusion:
Battery longevity can be optimised by considering anaesthesia type and electrode location during implantation. Improved battery longevity reduces replacement frequency, associated complications and overall healthcare costs.
More Related Videos
09:16A General Method for Evaluating Deep Brain Stimulation Effects on Intravenous Methamphetamine Self-Administration
Published on: January 22, 2016
09:46Analysis of Gene Expression Changes in the Rat Hippocampus After Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Thalamic Nucleus
Published on: March 8, 2015