Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pre-Residency Research Engagement and Subsequent Publication Output Among Orthopaedic Surgery Applicants.

Ben Setaro1, Evan London1, Siddarth Dasari1

  • 1School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

JB & JS Open Access
|July 10, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiplex fluorescent immunocytochemistry is a complementary test for the diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis: a diagnostic clinical trial.

Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2026
Same author

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Treatment for Effusive Feline Infectious Peritonitis with GS-441524 in Seventeen Retrovirus-Positive Cats.

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Is preoperative emergency department utilization associated with postoperative healthcare utilization after total joint arthroplasty? A social vulnerability index based analysis.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Complete Proximal Rectus Femoris Avulsion Repair in a Division I Collegiate Track Athlete: A Case Report.

JBJS case connector·2026
Same author

Comparative analysis of CRISPR-Cas9, lentiviral transduction, and base editing for sickle cell disease in a murine model.

Blood advances·2025
Same author

Hybrid fixation and sciatic neurolysis of an ischial tuberosity avulsion fracture with neurologic symptoms: a case report.

Orthopedic reviews·2025

Preresidency research quantity, including total items and citations, does not predict future orthopaedic surgery publication output. However, qualitative factors like presentations and high-impact publications are associated with continued research productivity.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Medical Education
  • Research Productivity

Background:

  • Orthopaedic surgery residency applications increasingly emphasize research productivity due to pass/fail grading shifts.
  • The average number of research items on applications has quadrupled since 2011.
  • It remains unclear if preresidency research quantity predicts long-term research output.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the association between preresidency research productivity metrics and future publication output in orthopaedic surgery.
  • To determine if qualitative research indicators predict long-term research success.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective cohort study of 822 orthopaedic surgery residency applicants from the 2010 cycle.
  • Collected Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) data including research experiences, items, presentations, and publications.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed post-application publication output using Scopus and PubMed, excluding 309 applicants without Scopus records.

    • Main Results:

    • Post-ERAS publication count correlated significantly with poster/oral presentations (P=0.023) and publication in top-15 journals (P=0.027).
    • No significant association was found between post-ERAS publications and research experiences, hours, total items, manuscript count, or citation counts.
    • Qualitative metrics (presentations, journal impact) predicted future output, while quantitative metrics (volume) did not.

    Conclusions:

    • Meaningful research involvement, indicated by presentations and publication quality, better predicts sustained publication output than sheer volume.
    • Residency programs should consider qualitative aspects of research engagement when evaluating applicants.
    • Future research should explore the nuances of research quality in predicting academic success.