Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
Published on: April 29, 2014
Statistical Reporting Quality in Dental Research: A Comparative Analysis by Journal Impact and Study Design
Manuel Antonio Mattos-Vela1, Martha Cecilia Rodríguez-Vargas1, Teresa Angélica Evaristo-Chiyong1
1Faculty of Dentistry, SAETA Research Group, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Statistical reporting quality in dental journals is low, with frequent errors in P values and sample size justification. Observational studies exhibit better statistical reporting than experimental ones.
Area of Science:
- Dental research
- Statistical reporting quality
- Journal impact factor
Background:
- Assessing statistical reporting quality in dental publications is crucial.
- Journal impact (quartile 1 vs. quartile 3) may influence report quality.
- Study design (observational vs. experimental) could affect statistical reporting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the statistical report quality of dental articles.
- To determine if journal impact factor influences statistical reporting quality.
- To assess the relationship between study design and statistical report quality.
Main Methods:
- Random sample of original articles from four general dentistry journals (two high-impact, two medium-impact).
- Categorization of study designs as observational, experimental, or other.
- Assessment of statistical error indicators by two independent statisticians.
Main Results:
- A high prevalence of statistical errors (85.6%) was observed across articles.
- Articles in medium-impact journals showed a slightly higher error rate (91.7%) than high-impact journals (83.7%).
- A significant relationship was found between study design and the presence/number of statistical errors (P=0.009, P=0.011).
Conclusions:
- Dental articles exhibit low statistical reporting quality, with common errors.
- Inaccurate P value reporting and lack of sample size justification are prevalent issues.
- Observational studies demonstrate superior statistical reporting quality compared to experimental studies.
Related Concept Videos
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
