Statistical Reporting Quality in Dental Research: A Comparative Analysis by Journal Impact and Study Design
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
Published on: April 29, 2014
Manuel Antonio Mattos-Vela1, Martha Cecilia Rodríguez-Vargas1, Teresa Angélica Evaristo-Chiyong1
1Faculty of Dentistry, SAETA Research Group, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Background:
Determine the statistical report quality of articles published in dental journals according to the level of impact of the journal and the study design.
Methods:
A random sample of original articles published in four journals of General Dentistry indexed in Scopus was evaluated, two high-impact (quartile 1) and two medium-impact (quartile 3). The study design was recorded as observational, experimental, or other. The quality of each report was assessed through seven statistical error indicators. Two statisticians independently evaluated the articles and then contrasted their results; in the case of discrepancies in the ratings, they reached an agreement to establish a consensual criterion. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied with post hoc Dunn-Bonferroni correction.
Results:
The presence of at least one statistical error was high (85.6%), with 123 (83.7%) and 44 (91.7%) articles in high- and medium-impact journals, respectively. Two statistical errors were more common (32.3%). We found a relationship between the presence of some errors (P = 0.009) and the number of statistical errors (P = 0.011) with the study design.
Conclusions:
There is a low-quality statistical report of the evaluated dental articles, as errors are very common; among these errors, inaccurate descriptions of the P values and a lack of justification for the sample size were the most common. The observational studies were also of higher quality than the experimental studies.
Related Concept Videos
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Chi-square Analysis
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
