Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Tumor Treating Field Therapy in Combination with Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Published on: October 27, 2014
Capecitabine-based triplet (TPX) as induction chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer: a daycare-based cohort
Rituparna Biswas1,2, Krishnangshu Bhanja Choudhury1,3, Anirban Halder4,5
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Malda Medical College, Malda, West Bengal 732101, India.
Background:
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a global health burden. Induction chemotherapy using the regimen docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) improves outcomes in advanced cases but requires continuous 5-FU infusion, limiting feasibility in daycare settings. Capecitabine, an oral prodrug of 5-FU, offers a convenient alternative. This study evaluates the efficacy and tolerability of a capecitabine-based triplet regimen docetaxel, carboplatin, capecitabine (TPX) as induction chemotherapy in a resource-limited, outpatient setting.
Methods:
This retrospective cohort study included 52 patients with stage IVA-IVB HNSCC treated between August 2023 and March 2025 at a Medical college in West Bengal, India. Patients were intended to receive four cycles of TPX every 21 days. Tumour response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1 after induction and following definitive therapy (surgery or chemoradiotherapy (CTRT)). Toxicities were recorded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Primary outcomes were response rates and toxicity; secondary outcome was feasibility of proceeding to curative treatment.
Results:
The cohort (median age 46 years; 65.4% male) had 38.5% oral cavity tumours. Following induction chemotherapy, the overall response rate (ORR) was 84.6%, with 100% ORR after definitive treatment. Oral cavity tumours showed 80% partial response (PR) post-induction; ten patients underwent successful surgery, while others received CTRT. In non-oral cavity cancers, 75% had a PR and 12.5% achieved a complete response post-induction. Toxicity was manageable; grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 9.6%, high-grade non-hematologic toxicity was also meagre and no treatment-related deaths were reported. Most patients (76.9%) completed all four cycles.
Conclusion:
The TPX regimen is a well-tolerated and effective alternative to TPF for induction chemotherapy in advanced HNSCC, especially in daycare settings. It enables high response rates and facilitates curative treatment while avoiding the logistical challenges of infusional 5-FU. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm survival benefits and support broader adoption.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...