Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

09:47
DeepOmicsAE: Representing Signaling Modules in Alzheimer's Disease with Deep Learning Analysis of Proteomics, Metabolomics, and Clinical Data
Published on: December 15, 2023
AI-driven diagnosis of mpox using deep learning models
Bassam W Aboshosha1, Shafiq Ul Rehman2, Lamees N Mahmoud1,3
1School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, Hosted by Global Academic Foundation, New Administrative Capital, Egypt.
Plos One
|July 10, 2026
Summary
This study establishes a reliable benchmark for mpox image classification, comparing models on a unified dataset. A weighted ensemble model achieved the highest performance, offering a trustworthy reference for future research.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Computer Science
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Mpox lesions share visual similarities with other skin conditions, necessitating reliable image-based diagnostic tools.
- Existing studies on mpox image classification are difficult to compare due to variations in dataset creation, augmentation strategies, and evaluation methods.
- Developing a standardized and reproducible benchmark is crucial for advancing automated mpox detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish a leakage-aware benchmark for binary mpox classification.
- To compare the performance of various pretrained deep learning models and a weighted ensemble.
- To provide a trustworthy reference dataset and evaluation methodology for mpox image analysis.
Main Methods:
- A unified dataset was created from MSLD v1.0 and v2.0, ensuring data integrity.
- Seven pretrained deep learning backbones and a weighted ensemble were evaluated using group-stratified five-fold cross-validation.
- Evaluation included original-only testing, validation-based threshold selection, and temperature scaling for model calibration.
Main Results:
- The weighted ensemble model achieved a mean accuracy of 0.8729, an F1-score of 0.8334, and an AUC of 0.9388.
- ConvNeXt-Tiny demonstrated the strongest performance among single models, with an F1-score of 0.8159 and an AUC of 0.9284.
- Results are presented as conservative, trustworthy reference values due to rigorous evaluation protocols.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a transparent and reproducible benchmark for mpox classification, emphasizing dataset curation and grouped evaluation.
- The developed benchmark offers a reliable reference point, though external clinical validation is required for diagnostic deployment.
- Methodological transparency and reproducible dataset curation are highlighted as key limitations and contributions to the field.