Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
Unravelling determinants of symptoms associated with environmental factors over time: Results from a representative
Tara Petzke1, Ferenc Köteles2, Renáta Szemerszky2
1Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ruhr University Bochum, Massenbergstraße 9-13, Bochum, 44787, Germany; Université Paris Cité, VIFASOM (Vigilance Fatigue Sommeil et Santé Publique), 1 Parvis Notre-Dame, Paris, F-75004, France; Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1266, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neuroscience de Paris, 102-108 Rue de la Santé, Paris, F-75014, France.
Abstract:
Symptoms associated with environmental factors (SAEF) are associated with behavioral and emotional reactions towards environmental factors, modern health worries, botheredness with these factors, and heightened somatic symptom burden. While all these constructs play a part in SAEF, it is unclear how they relate to each other over time. The aim of this study was to unravel determinants of SAEF and compare them with those observed in healthy individuals. We used a longitudinal population-based Swedish dataset with three timepoints (N = 1576), in which we conducted lag-2 cross-lagged panel models. Modern health worries (MHWS) and negative behavioral and emotional reactions towards the environment predicted botheredness with environmental factors from Time 1 to Time 2 (from MHWS: β = 0.05, 95% CI = [0.01; 0.10], p = .02; from reactions: β = 0.14, 95% CI = [0.10; 0.19], p < .001) and vice versa (to MHWS: β = 0.07, 95% CI = [0.02; 0.13], p = .009; to reactions: β = 0.14, 95% CI = [0.10; 0.19], p < .001). Physical symptoms were predicted by botheredness with environmental factors and modern health worries at Time 2, but at Time 3 physical symptoms were no longer predicted by any of the other constructs. When testing the model on individuals with SAEF vs. healthy individuals, we found that the paths are mostly equally strong in both groups (χ2 difference = 37.42, df = 27, p = 0.087), but that the clusters differed in their levels of the variables (χ2 difference = 569.52, df = 9, p <0.001). In conclusion, this study suggests that cognitive, emotional and behavioral features of SAEF are mutually dependent, and participate in a vicious circle that perpetuate symptoms, which speaks in favor of nocebo effects contributing to SAEF and opens avenues for treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Introduction to Epidemiology
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...