Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
The DECISION study: protocol for the development and internal validation of a multimodal decision-making capacity
Carolin I Kurz1, Paulina Tegethoff2, Johanna Gelz2
1Department of Psychiatry, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; Legal Affairs Department, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
This study introduces a structured framework to assess decision-making capacity (DMC) in individuals with neurocognitive disorders, improving objective evaluation for informed consent and research. The new method enhances standardization and reliability for cognitively impaired populations.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Clinical Psychology
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Decision-making capacity (DMC) assessment for neurocognitive disorders lacks standardization and is often subjective.
- Current instruments are resource-intensive and not adapted for real-world or stage-specific applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and internally validate a structured, multimodal framework for assessing DMC across the Alzheimer's disease continuum.
- To operationalize core DMC domains: understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and expression of choice.
Main Methods:
- A modular framework integrating neuropsychological profiling, informant measures, and decision scenarios.
- Internal validation against MacCAT-T, with CDR for disease characterization.
- Co-design approach with patients, caregivers, clinicians, and experts.
Main Results:
- The framework provides standardized scoring and quantifiable outputs for DMC assessment.
- Evidence generated on feasibility, reliability, and criterion validity of the multimodal approach.
- Exploratory analyses examine associations between DMC and neurodegenerative disease markers.
Conclusions:
- The developed framework supports transparent and quantifiable capacity assessment within the German legal context.
- It integrates cognitive, functional, and contextual dimensions for cognitively impaired populations.
- Potential to inform future research and ethically robust consent procedures after external validation.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...