Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
The DECISION study: protocol for the development and internal validation of a multimodal decision-making capacity
Carolin I Kurz1, Paulina Tegethoff2, Johanna Gelz2
1Department of Psychiatry, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany; Legal Affairs Department, LMU University Hospital, LMU Medizin, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Background And Objectives:
Decision-making capacity (DMC) is a prerequisite for valid informed consent, as well as being a key methodological requirement in clinical and epidemiological research. For individuals with neurocognitive disorders, DMC assessment is frequently based on subjective clinical judgment, with limited standardization and significant variability across settings. Current instruments are resource-intensive and not sufficiently adapted for stage-specific or real-world applications. To develop and internally validate a structured multimodal framework for assessing DMC in individuals across the Alzheimer's disease continuum.
Methods:
We propose a modular assessment framework that operationalizes the core domains of DMC: understanding, appreciation, reasoning, and expression of choice. This is complemented by neuropsychological profiling, informant-based measures and structured decision scenarios. Internal validation will be performed against established functional reference standards, including the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), while the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) will be used for disease characterization only. Primary analyses focus on feasibility, reliability, and criterion validity. Biomarkers and neuroimaging measures are examined as exploratory contextual correlates of decisional vulnerability and are not used to define DMC. The codesign approach thus integrates both patient and caregiver perspectives as well as clinician and expert input, with focus group interviews providing a complementary, structured format to capture interdisciplinary professional perspectives.
Results:
The protocol is designed to generate evidence regarding feasibility, reliability, and criterion validity of a multimodal DMC assessment framework. It provides standardized scoring and quantifiable outputs, as well as a basis for stage-sensitive interpretation. Exploratory analyses will further evaluate associations between functional DMC and markers of neurodegenerative disease burden. This methodological framework provides a standardized, reproducible approach to assessing decision-making capacity in cognitively vulnerable populations.
Conclusion:
Developed within the German legal framework, it integrates cognitive, functional, and contextual dimensions to support more transparent and quantifiable capacity assessment. Following external validation, the framework may inform future clinical studies, observational research, and ethically robust consent procedures in cognitively impaired populations.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...