Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay (DAPA)
Published on: August 21, 2016
The role of non-coding variants in hereditary cancer syndromes: mechanistic insights and clinical implications
Shinto Bosco1, Shreya Singh Beniwal2, Yamini Saraswathi Gurram3
1Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pimpri, Pune, India.
Abstract:
Hereditary cancer syndromes have often been associated with genetic mutations in both coding and non-coding regions of DNA. Much attention has been placed on coding mutations, but less so on non-coding variants, which are changes in gene regulation, transcription factor binding, and RNA splicing that are frequently missed in standard genetic tests. The goal of this review is to bring forth the importance of these non-coding mutations in contributing to cancer risk by disrupting gene expression, splicing processes, and epigenetic modifications. We reviewed recent developments in whole-genome sequencing and RNA sequencing, which have enabled better identification of these non-coding variants. The major findings underline the important role that non-coding mutations play in hereditary cancers by changing RNA function and gene regulation. The inclusion of non-coding regions in genetic tests improves our ability to diagnose cancer and predict risk more precisely. Moreover, RNA-targeted therapies, for instance, miRNA inhibitors, can potentially be used for improved treatment of cancers. Despite advances in hereditary cancer testing, a substantial proportion of high-risk individuals remain genetically unresolved after conventional coding-region analysis. Increasing evidence suggests that pathogenic non-coding variants - including enhancer mutations, promoter hypermethylation, deep intronic splice-altering variants, and dysregulated non-coding RNAs - may contribute significantly to hereditary cancer susceptibility and explain a subset of unresolved familial cancer syndromes. This review critically examines the molecular mechanisms, clinical implications, current evidence hierarchy, and translational relevance of non-coding variants in hereditary cancer syndromes. Particular emphasis is placed on functional validation strategies, whole-genome and transcriptomic approaches, and emerging RNA-/epigenetic-targeted therapeutic applications. In the future, efforts should focus on integrating multi-omics data and using state-of-the-art tools, such as CRISPR-based functional genomics, to improve diagnostic precision and personalized therapeutic strategies. This review proposes a mechanistic synthesis and translational framework for understanding non-coding variants in hereditary cancer, highlighting underexplored regulatory elements that escape conventional testing pipelines.
Insights
Non-coding genetic variants significantly contribute to hereditary cancers by altering gene regulation and RNA function. Incorporating these variants into genetic testing enhances cancer risk prediction and diagnosis accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Hereditary cancers are linked to genetic mutations, with a focus on coding regions.
- Non-coding variants, affecting gene regulation and RNA splicing, are often overlooked in standard genetic tests.
- A significant portion of hereditary cancer cases remain genetically unresolved after conventional testing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the critical role of non-coding mutations in hereditary cancer susceptibility.
- To review advancements in identifying non-coding variants using whole-genome and RNA sequencing.
- To discuss the clinical implications and therapeutic potential of non-coding variants.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature on whole-genome sequencing and RNA sequencing.
- Analysis of molecular mechanisms of non-coding variants in gene expression and splicing.
- Examination of functional validation strategies and multi-omics data integration.
Main Results:
- Non-coding mutations significantly impact hereditary cancer risk by altering gene regulation and RNA function.
- Deep intronic splice-altering variants, enhancer mutations, and dysregulated non-coding RNAs contribute to hereditary cancer susceptibility.
- RNA-targeted therapies show promise for cancer treatment.
Conclusions:
- Including non-coding regions in genetic testing improves cancer diagnosis and risk prediction.
- Understanding non-coding variants is crucial for resolving unresolved familial cancer syndromes.
- Future research should integrate multi-omics data and advanced tools for personalized cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
