Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
A nomogram for predicting progression-free survival in stage III-IV gastric cancer based on post-treatment
Dan Hu1, Yumin Wang1, Yongjie Zhang1
1Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Huai'an, China.
Background:
Serum cholinesterase (CHE) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are established prognostic markers in gastric cancer, but their levels after two cycles of therapy are rarely incorporated into predictive models. This study aimed to develop a nomogram integrating post-treatment CHE and CRP levels after two cycles of first-line therapy to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with stage III-IV gastric adenocarcinoma.
Methods:
This retrospective study included 104 treatment-naïve patients with stage III-IV gastric adenocarcinoma who received first-line therapy. Serum CHE and CRP were measured after two cycles. Optimal prognostic cut-off values were determined by maximally selected rank statistics and validated via bootstrap resampling. Independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression to construct a nomogram. Model performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Overfitting was quantified by repeated K-fold cross-validation. Public transcriptomic data were analyzed via gene set variation analysis (GSVA) to explore associated pathways.
Results:
Optimal cut-off values were 4,865 U/L for CHE and 2.58 mg/L for CRP, confirmed by bootstrap validation. Multivariate analysis identified low post-treatment CHE (≤4,865 U/L) as an independent protective factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20-0.63; P<0.001]. Elevated CRP (>2.58 mg/L) (HR =1.67; 95% CI: 0.99-2.84; P=0.06) and peritoneal metastasis (HR =1.66; 95% CI: 0.93-2.95; P=0.09) were associated with increased risk. The nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.709 (95% CI: 0.652-0.766), improving to 0.751 after cross-validation adjustment. Time-dependent ROC yielded areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.789, 0.836, and 0.760 for 6-, 12-, and 18-month PFS, respectively. Risk stratification based on nomogram scores revealed significantly poorer PFS in the high-risk group (P<0.001). Bioinformatics analysis suggested upregulation of the complement and coagulation cascades pathway in advanced gastric cancer, correlating with poorer prognosis and M2-type macrophage infiltration.
Conclusions:
A nomogram incorporating post-treatment CHE and CRP levels after two therapy cycles enables individualized PFS prediction and risk stratification in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. The associated complement pathway may underlie an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.
