Clinical management of vestibular schwannoma - what's the evidence?

Egil Brudvik1, Morten Lund-Johansen1,2, Øystein Vesterli Tveiten1

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies Vei 65, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.

Acta Neurochirurgica
|July 11, 2026
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Choosing the best treatment for vestibular schwannomas (VS) is challenging due to limited high-quality evidence. While radiosurgery and microsurgery offer high tumor control, prospective trials are needed to determine optimal patient care strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Oncology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Vestibular schwannomas (VS) management includes observation, radiosurgery, and microsurgery.
  • Optimal treatment modality lacks consensus due to scarce high-level evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review clinical and radiographic outcomes of observation, radiosurgery, and microsurgery for vestibular schwannomas.
  • To highlight the need for higher-quality evidence in VS treatment decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Narrative review of current understanding of VS treatment outcomes.
  • Analysis of clinical and radiographic data from observational and limited comparative studies.

Main Results:

  • Observation leads to tumor growth in ~33% within 3 years; ~40% eventually need active treatment.
  • Radiosurgery shows >90% radiological and >95% clinical control at 10 years, with variable hearing preservation.
  • Microsurgery achieves high tumor removal and control (<2% recurrence), but risks hearing/nerve damage increase with tumor size.

Conclusions:

  • Current vestibular schwannoma evidence relies heavily on retrospective studies with varied methods.
  • Prospective, randomized controlled trials are essential for superior treatment strategies and improved patient care.