Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
Published on: June 28, 2019
Quantitative PET coronary flow capacity and comprehensive management of chronic CAD: Lessons from the randomized
K Lance Gould1, Nils P Johson1
1From the Weatherhead PET Center for Preventing and Reversing Atherosclerosis, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, and Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Insights
A comprehensive strategy for chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) significantly reduced death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization compared to standard care. This approach integrated lifestyle changes and medical treatment, reserving revascularization for severe cases identified by coronary flow capacity (CFC) testing.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Diseases
- Preventive Medicine
- Medical Interventions
Background:
- Previous randomized trials in chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) focused on single interventions.
- The CENTURY trial investigated a comprehensive strategy combining lifestyle modification, medical treatment, and revascularization.
- Revascularization was reserved for patients with severely reduced coronary flow capacity (CFC) identified by positron emission tomography (PET).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a comprehensive care strategy against standard community care for patients with high-risk CAD.
- To evaluate the impact of the comprehensive strategy on reducing death, myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization.
- To assess the role of CFC quantification by PET in guiding revascularization decisions.
Main Methods:
- 1028 high-risk CAD patients were randomized to either comprehensive or standard care.
- Coronary flow capacity (CFC) was assessed using rest-stress PET at baseline, 2, and 5 years.
- Comprehensive care involved frequent support and PET result review; standard care had limited contact and blinded PET results.
Main Results:
- Comprehensive care significantly reduced summed risk factor score, all-cause death (4.7% vs. 8.2%), death or MI (7.0% vs. 11.1%), and revascularization (9.6% vs. 14.8%) at 5 years.
- Major adverse cardiac events were significantly lower in the comprehensive care group (20.5% vs. 29.9%).
- Intense adherence to comprehensive risk factor control correlated with further reductions in adverse events during extended follow-up.
Conclusions:
- The CENTURY trial demonstrated that a comprehensive integrated approach significantly reduces mortality and major adverse cardiac events in chronic CAD patients.
- Reserving revascularization for severely reduced CFC, guided by PET, proved effective and safe.
- This strategy offers a promising model for managing chronic CAD, emphasizing prevention and tailored interventions.
Background And Aims:
Randomized trials in chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) tested single interventions of lifestyle, medical treatment, or revascularization. The randomized CENTURY trial tested a comprehensive strategy integrating intense lifestyle modification, medical treatment and revascularization reserved for severely reduced coronary flow capacity (CFC) by positron emission tomography (PET), for reducing death, myocardial infarction and revascularization compared with referring-cardiologist-directed standard community care.
Methods:
Participants with high risk factors, suspected or known CAD were randomly assigned to comprehensive or standard care. Rest-stress PET quantified CFC for physiological CAD severity at baseline, 2 and 5 years. Comprehensive care group reviewed PET results with frequent clinic visits and open 24/7 phone/email support. Standard care lacked supportive contact with blinded PET results, unblinded for severely reduced CFC with high mortality risk for potential revascularization.
Results:
Of 1028 randomized participants, 515 were assigned to comprehensive care and 513 to standard care for the 5-year protocol with additional follow-up over next 5 to 11 years. Comprehensive vs standard care significantly decreased summed risk factor score at 5-years (P < 0.0001), all-cause death (4.7% vs. 8.2%; P = 0.023), death or MI (7.0% vs. 11.1%; P = 0.024), late revascularization (9.6% vs 14.8%; P = 0.011) and major adverse cardiac events (20.5% vs 29.9%; P = 0.0006). Only 56 of 1028 (5.4%) CENTURY patients had revascularization within 90 days guided by CFC severity, thereby reassuring and motivating patients and physicians for safely pursuing preventive risk factor goals while reserving angiogram-revascularization for high-risk, severe CFC. Intensity of adherence to comprehensive risk factor control during 5-years associated with additional significantly reduced death, MI and revascularizations over next 5 to 11 years.
Conclusions:
The randomised CENTURY trial demonstrates that comprehensive integrated lifestyle modification and optimal medical treatment with revascularization reserved for severely reduced CFC significantly reduced death, death or MI, and revascularization at 5 years and potentially over extended 5 to 11 years of non-predefined follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00756379).
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Angina IV: Management
