Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Considerations for the Validation of Non-CFU Based Bio-Fluorescent Particle Counting Technologies.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2025
Same author

Understanding the Non-Equivalency of Bio-Fluorescent Particle Counts versus the Colony-Forming Unit.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2023
Same author

Challenges Encountered in the Implementation of Bio-Fluorescent Particle Counting Systems as a Routine Microbial Monitoring Tool.

PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology·2022
Same author

Time-resolved monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons adsorbed on atmospheric particles.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2017
Same author

Assessing the Dynamics of Organic Aerosols over the North Atlantic Ocean.

Scientific reports·2017
Same author

A flash-lamp based device for fluorescence detection and identification of individual pollen grains.

The Review of scientific instruments·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System
08:59

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System

Published on: May 22, 2020

Justification and Impact of Reduced Sampling Flow Rates for Total Particle Counting in Grade A Environments.

Petra Merker1, Didier Hélal1, Svetlana Kiseleva1

  • 1Plair SA, Route de Saint-Julien 275, 1258 Perly (Geneva), Switzerland.

PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
|July 11, 2026
PubMed
Summary

New Biofluorescent Particle Counters (BFPCs) at lower flow rates are suitable for Grade A environments. Studies show lower flow rates are non-inferior to standard rates for environmental monitoring, ensuring equivalent control.

Keywords:
Alternative and Rapid Microbiological Methods (ARMM)Biofluorescent Particle Counters (BFPC)EU GMP Annex 1Environmental monitoringNon-viable Particle Counting

More Related Videos

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater
08:27

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater

Published on: November 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System
08:59

Measuring Sub-23 Nanometer Real Driving Particle Number Emissions Using the Portable DownToTen Sampling System

Published on: May 22, 2020

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater
08:27

Sampling and Identification of Microplastics in Groundwater

Published on: November 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Technology
  • Cleanroom Environmental Monitoring
  • Particle Counting Science

Background:

  • Current EU GMP Annex 1 guidelines reference 28.3 L/min for total particle counting.
  • Newer Biofluorescent Particle Counters (BFPCs) operate at lower flow rates (e.g., 5 L/min) for simultaneous viable and total particle detection.
  • Lower flow rates offer potential advantages in viable particle detection efficiency and reduced particle losses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide data supporting the use of lower flow rate particle counters in Grade A environments.
  • To compare the performance of particle counters at standard (28.3 L/min) and lower (2.83 L/min) flow rates.
  • To assess non-inferiority in detecting environmental quality deviations for 0.5 μm and 5 μm particles.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative performance analysis of two particle counters (28.3 L/min and 2.83 L/min) in two Grade A simulated environments.
  • Experimental setups included a laboratory-scale microbiological biosafety cabinet (BSC) and a full-scale Grade A chamber.
  • Identical contamination events were introduced to evaluate detection capabilities across different scales and airflow dynamics.

Main Results:

  • High concordance in alert thresholds was observed between the two particle counters under unidirectional airflow.
  • No consistent preference for alert precedence was found between the standard and lower flow rate instruments.
  • In the BSC setup, lag time between instruments was ≤1 minute in 96% of cases, indicating rapid detection.

Conclusions:

  • Particle counters operating at lower flow rates are non-inferior to standard flow rates for environmental monitoring in Grade A zones.
  • Lower flow rate particle counters maintain equivalent environmental control.
  • The findings support the suitability of lower flow rate BFPCs for Grade A applications.