Hybrid Thoracoscopic-Endocardial Versus Endocardial Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A

Annelyse Vitória Barbosa1, Bárbara Reis Silva1, Pedro Lucas Alves Alencar2

  • 1Internal Medicine Department, Medical Sciences and Life School Pontifical Catholic University of Goiás Goiás Brazil.

Journal of Arrhythmia
|July 12, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Hybrid ablation (HA) offers improved rhythm control for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to catheter ablation (CA), reducing arrhythmias and medication needs. However, HA has a higher complication risk, requiring careful patient selection and experienced centers.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Cardiac Surgery
  • Electrophysiology

Background:

  • Persistent, long-standing atrial fibrillation (AF) presents challenges for traditional endocardial catheter ablation (CA).
  • Hybrid ablation (HA), combining thoracoscopic and endocardial approaches, aims to overcome these limitations.
  • This review evaluates HA versus CA for rhythm control and safety in persistent AF patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of hybrid ablation (HA) versus endocardial catheter ablation (CA).
  • To assess rhythm-control outcomes, including freedom from AF and arrhythmia recurrence.
  • To evaluate procedural safety and complication rates associated with both HA and CA.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing HA and CA in adults with non-paroxysmal AF.
  • Searches conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.
  • Primary outcomes included freedom from AF, atrial arrhythmia, antiarrhythmic drug use, recurrence, and repeat ablation.

Main Results:

  • Eight studies involving 907 patients were analyzed (478 HA, 429 CA).
  • HA did not significantly reduce AF or arrhythmia recurrence compared to CA.
  • HA significantly reduced other atrial arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drug use, and repeat ablation rates, but increased complication risk.

Conclusions:

  • Hybrid ablation provides superior rhythm control for persistent AF compared to catheter ablation.
  • Despite greater procedural complexity and a higher risk of complications, HA is an effective strategy in selected patients.
  • Experienced multidisciplinary programs demonstrate comparable safety profiles for HA and CA.
Abstract