Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

08:22
Measuring Cardiac Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) Activity in Toddlers - Resting and Developmental Challenges
Published on: February 25, 2016
Recess as a Setting for Child Development: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Physical Activity, Motor Skills and
Johanna E A Brocken1, Martijn Meeter1, Anne G M de Bruijn1
1LEARN! Research Institute, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
The Journal of School Health
|July 12, 2026
Summary
A one-year recess intervention in primary schools did not improve physical activity or social-emotional skills. Motor skills improved more in the control group, suggesting interventions need context-specific strategies for children's development.
Area of Science:
- Child Development
- School Health Interventions
- Physical Activity Research
Background:
- Recess is recognized for boosting physical activity, yet its impact on broader child development remains inconclusive.
- Existing evidence on the developmental benefits of recess interventions is mixed, necessitating further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of a one-year recess intervention on physical activity, motor skills, and social-emotional functioning in primary school children.
- To assess the effectiveness of standardized recess programs and inform the development of context-specific strategies for promoting children's active play.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 1154 children across 21 Dutch primary schools.
- Intervention effects were measured using accelerometers, observational methods, motor skill assessments (Athletic Skills Track), and social-emotional functioning reports.
- Implementation fidelity was monitored throughout the one-year study period.
Main Results:
- The recess intervention showed no significant effects on children's physical activity levels or social-emotional functioning.
- While motor skills improved in both intervention and control groups, the control group exhibited greater gains.
- Implementation fidelity did not significantly influence the study outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Standardized recess interventions may not yield intended developmental outcomes, underscoring the need for tailored, context-specific approaches.
- Greater motor skill development in the control group suggests that intervention effects are complex and influenced by various factors.
- Understanding what works, for whom, and under which conditions is crucial for optimizing recess interventions in schools.
