Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 14, 2026

11:06
3D Printing of Preclinical X-ray Computed Tomographic Data Sets
Published on: March 22, 2013
3D Printing a Clinically Available Solution From Plaster-Based Positives in Superficial Radiation Therapy
Rory Hartley1, Linda Bell1, Toby Lowe1
1Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.
Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences
|July 13, 2026
Summary
Computed Tomography (CT) Scanned 3D Print (CT3DP) is the most accurate and preferred method for creating facial radiotherapy shielding masks. This 3D printing technique offers superior precision and efficiency compared to traditional methods.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Technology
- 3D Printing Applications
Background:
- Superficial/orthovoltage (SXT) facial radiotherapy requires custom lead shielding masks.
- Current Plaster Cast Positive Mould (PCPM) methods are time-intensive and may be unavailable.
- Evaluating advanced 3D printing techniques is crucial for improving radiotherapy mask fabrication.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy and practicality of Computed Tomography (CT) Scanned 3D Print (CT3DP) and Optical Scan 3D Print (OS3DP) against Plaster Cast Positive Mould (PCPM) for facial radiotherapy masks.
- To identify the optimal method for SXT facial radiotherapy mask creation, especially where PCPM is not feasible.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving twelve patients undergoing facial SXT treatment from July 2022 to January 2023.
- Utilized Plaster Cast Positive Mould (PCPM), Optical Scan 3D Print (OS3DP) with Skanect Structure Sensor, and CT Scanned 3D Print (CT3DP) via Varian Eclipse and Adaptiiv 3D Bolus software.
- Assessed accuracy through surface mesh comparisons, manual measurements, and blind preference testing.
Main Results:
- CT3DP demonstrated superior accuracy with a mean maximum deviation of 14.8 mm and average surface difference of 2.6 mm.
- OS3DP showed deviations of 17.0 mm and 3.4 mm, respectively.
- Blind testing revealed an 81.4% preference for CT3DP, which also proved more time-efficient than PCPM.
Conclusions:
- CT3DP is the most accurate, efficient, and clinically preferred method for fabricating SXT facial radiotherapy masks.
- Despite the need for CT imaging, CT3DP's precision and reproducibility position it as a strong replacement for PCPM in clinical practice.

