Related Experiment Videos
"Strong Opinions, Loosely Held": A Renewed Call for Error-driven Learning in Medical Education
Hunter Scott1, Brian Devorkin2
1Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH USA.
Abstract:
Improving clinical reasoning is a national priority to reduce medical error. This commentary advocates for "strong opinions, loosely held" as a cognitive aid to improve reasoning and retention in medical education. Learners should commit confidently to decisions while remaining open to revision as new evidence emerges. Grounded in prediction error theory, which emphasizes memory retention when expectations are upset, this approach mirrors expert clinician strategies. Case-based curricula can operationalize this by prompting early hypotheses and reassessment. Despite concerns about overconfidence, we view discomfort as natural when transitioning from passive to active learning, ultimately promoting autonomy, improved retention, and deeper engagement.
Related Concept Videos
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data from the...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors
Random and Systematic Errors