Aligning Horizon Scanning Approaches with Differing Needs and Topics at the Science-Policy Interface on Chemicals,...

Area of Science:

• Environmental Science
• Policy Studies
• Risk Assessment

Background:

• Knowledge on chemicals, waste, and pollution is subject to geographical, financial, and disciplinary biases.
• These biases create blind spots for emerging issues, particularly affecting low-income countries and vulnerable populations.
• The Intergovernmental Science-Policy Panel on Chemicals, Waste, and Pollution (ISP-CWP) requires tools to identify overlooked issues.

Purpose of the Study:

• To provide guidance on aligning horizon scanning approaches for chemicals, waste, and pollution.
• To support scientists, practitioners, affected communities, and policymakers in identifying emerging issues.
• To enhance the effectiveness of the ISP-CWP through improved foresight.

Main Methods:

• Structuring guidance around three core dimensions: topics ('what'), actors ('who'), and methods ('how').
• Drawing on existing horizon scanning efforts and foresight practices.
• Outlining inclusive and transparent approaches for prospective assessments.

Main Results:

• Horizon scanning, when strategically designed, can identify emerging issues missed by traditional approaches.
• Inclusive methods can correct epistemic asymmetries and integrate local and indigenous knowledge.
• Transparent approaches enhance the legitimacy of global governance processes.

Conclusions:

• Horizon scanning is a critical tool for identifying emerging chemicals, waste, and pollution issues.
• Aligning horizon scanning with specific objectives and diverse actors promotes equity and anticipatory policy.
• Effective horizon scanning supports collective action towards environmental sustainability and a livable planet for all.