Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Renal Capsule Xenografting and Subcutaneous Pellet Implantation for the Evaluation of Prostate Carcinogenesis and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Published on: August 28, 2013
Pseudocapsule status combined with pathological parameters predicts prognosis in renal cell carcinoma
Jiaxi Yao1, Wei Xi2, Hong Wang3
1Department of Urology, Hexi University Affiliated Zhangye People's Hospital, Zhangye, China.
Background:
We evaluated whether pseudocapsule status, alone and in combination with pathological parameters, could serve as a prognostic marker in human renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 1560 patients with RCC who underwent surgery at a single institution between 2007 and 2012. The patients were randomly assigned to training (n=780) and validation (n=780) cohorts. Pseudocapsule status was classified as grade 0 (intact pseudocapsule without breakthrough), grade 1 (pseudocapsule invasion), and grade 2 (pseudocapsule breakthrough or absence). A pseudocapsule-pathological parameter score (PPS) was constructed by integrating pseudocapsule status with pathological type, Fuhrman grade, nuclear necrosis, sarcomatoid transformation, microvascular infiltration, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score, and tumor-node-metastasis stage. The scores were categorized as low, intermediate, and high. Overall survival and relapse-free survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.
Results:
Among the 1560 patients, 529 had grade 0 pseudocapsules, 701 had grade 1 pseudocapsules, and 330 had grade 2 pseudocapsules. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed better overall survival in patients with grade 0 pseudocapsules than those with grades 1 and 2. Multivariate analyses identified grade 2 pseudocapsule status as an independent predictor of worse overall survival (hazard ratio 3.94, 95% confidence interval 2.09-7.43, p < 0.001) and relapse-free survival (hazard ratio 2.87, 95% confidence interval 1.72-4.81, p < 0.001) in the training cohort. The validation cohort showed similar findings (overall survival: hazard ratio 2.64, 95% confidence interval 1.55-4.49, p < 0.001; relapse-free survival: hazard ratio 2.92, 95% confidence interval 1.81-4.71, p < 0.001). In addition, the PPS was independently associated with overall survival. Compared with the low PPS group, the high PPS group showed significantly worse prognosis in both cohorts (training: hazard ratio 33.58, 95% confidence interval 15.52-72.67, p < 0.001; validation: hazard ratio 18.10, 95% confidence interval 9.35-35.03, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Pseudocapsule status demonstrated good prognostic implications in RCC. Furthermore, the new PPS system, which combines pseudocapsule status with established pathological parameters, may better predict patient prognosis.