Comparison of the Efficacy of Pre-procedural Rinses Using 0.2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus a Stabilized Chlorine...

Aerosols produced during dental procedures carry a high microbial load, increasing the risk of cross-infection between patients and dental professionals. The use of pre-procedural mouth rinses is a simple, cost-effective, and practical measure to reduce microbial contamination in aerosols generated during dental treatment.

This study aimed to assess and compare the effectiveness of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and 0.1% stabilized chlorine dioxide (ClO₂) when used as pre-procedural rinses in patients with chronic periodontitis.

A total of 48 systemically healthy individuals with chronic periodontitis were randomly allocated to two groups: Group I (CHX) and Group II (ClO₂), with 24 participants in each group. Unstimulated saliva samples were obtained before and after rinsing. Microbial evaluation was done by quantifying aerobic and anaerobic colony-forming units (CFUs). Participants also recorded their perception of taste and odor using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were analyzed using paired and unpaired t-tests, with significance considered at p ≤ 0.05.

CHX showed a significant reduction (81.96%) in aerobic culture, whereas ClO₂ showed no statistical significance in reduction (40.91%) in aerobic culture. Both rinses produced a significant decline in anaerobic CFU counts; Group I showed an 86.05% reduction, and Group II showed a 79.75% reduction in microbial load. ClO₂ was rated higher on the VAS scale, reflecting better taste and odor acceptability.

Both CHX and ClO₂ effectively lowered anaerobic bacterial counts. While CHX had a stronger effect against aerobic bacteria, ClO₂ offered greater patient acceptability, supporting its use as a viable alternative in routine dental practice.