Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Using Human Differentially Expressed Gene Lists to Perform Downstream Pathway Enrichment Analysis and Target Prioritization
Published on: October 3, 2025
A tissue-aware computational framework for confounding-controlled co-expression network analysis: Context-dependent
Marc Ríos-Cadenas1, Iván Segura-Carmona1, Aurelio López-Fernández1
1SynergIA Laboratory (SIALAB), Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Ctra. Utrera km. 1, Seville, ES-41013, Spain.
Abstract:
Pan-cancer pharmacogenomic modelling using co-expression networks faces a fundamental challenge: topological metrics predominantly encode tissue identity rather than genuine pharmacological signal, inflating apparent predictive performance and undermining biological interpretability. We introduce a tissue-aware computational framework integrating tissue-specific WGCNA construction, within-tissue edge disruption profiling, and per-gene z-score standardisation, with tissue prediction accuracy as a quantitative acceptance criterion for confounder control. The framework was applied to 660 cancer cell lines across three targeted therapies (osimertinib, crizotinib, KRAS G12C Inhibitor-12) and evaluated under repeated stratified cross-validation with FDR correction. Within-tissue standardisation reduced tissue identity encoding in topological features from 88.9% to 12.9%. Within-tissue WGCNA modules outperformed a confounder-free PCA baseline across all three drugs, confirming genuine co-regulatory structure beyond dimensionality reduction. Osimertinib met the pre-specified primary improvement criterion (Δρ=+0.063, padj<0.001 versus tissue-residualised expression), while crizotinib and KRAS G12C Inhibitor-12 showed no meaningful improvement, establishing that the predictive benefit of co-expression topology is highly drug-context-dependent. A proof-of-concept feasibility check in an independent cohort (GSE255958) showed that baseline expression features discriminated drug-tolerant persister cells from responders in the EGFR context (AUC =0.758), though the small sample size precludes strong inferential claims and the network component could not be evaluated externally. This work establishes a reproducible computational standard for confounder-controlled co-expression network analysis in pan-cancer pharmacogenomics, with direct applicability to any CCLE- or GDSC-scale study.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This relationship...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction
Analysis Methods of Pharmacokinetic Data: Model and Model-Independent Approaches
The model approach uses mathematical models to describe changes in drug concentration over time. Pharmacokinetic models help characterize drug behavior in patients, predict drug concentration in the body fluids, calculate optimum dosage regimens, and evaluate the risk of toxicity. However, ensuring that the model fits the experimental data accurately...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model