Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Developing Neuroimaging Phenotypes of the Default Mode Network in PTSD: Integrating the Resting State, Working Memory, and Structural Connectivity
Published on: July 1, 2014
Pharmacologic and expectancy effects in depression: Associations with inter-network resting-state connectivity
Andrew R Gerlach1, Alyssa Neppach2, Ian Snyder3
1Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Abstract:
Depression involves dysregulation across large-scale neural networks, yet substantial heterogeneity in resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) across patients limits our understanding of treatment mechanisms. A key unresolved question is whether baseline network architecture differentially predicts response to pharmacological versus expectancy-driven treatment effects. In this mechanistic, hypothesis-generating study, 60 depressed participants completed resting-state fMRI at baseline and after 8 weeks of double-blind randomization to an SSRI or placebo. We tested whether connectivity between three networks - the dorsal attention (DAN), salience (SN), and default mode (DMN) networks - predicted treatment response as a function of drug assignment and treatment beliefs. We identified dissociable neural pathways for pharmacological and expectancy effects. Baseline connectivity between attention and salience networks, circuits involved in contextual processing, predicted response specifically among participants who developed placebo beliefs. Baseline connectivity between salience and default mode networks, circuits involved in mood regulation and internal state prediction, showed a double dissociation by drug assignment: higher connectivity predicted better outcomes with the SSRI, while lower connectivity predicted better outcomes with placebo. Network reorganization over treatment followed rather than predicted mood improvement and occurred only when drug assignment and belief aligned. These findings suggest that baseline connectivity patterns serve as trait-like neural markers differentiating pharmacological from expectancy-driven response pathways, and that network reorganization reflects a consequence of aligned pharmacological and psychological treatment effects. Replication in larger samples is warranted, but these results offer a novel framework for understanding and ultimately resolving heterogeneity in antidepressant treatment response.
More Related Videos
08:23A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy
Published on: November 13, 2016
08:15Network Pharmacology and Validation of the Antidepressant Mechanisms of Qiangzhifang in a Chronic Restraint Stress-induced Depression Rat Model
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
G-protein Coupled Receptors
Drugs Affecting Neurotransmitter Release or Uptake
Depression: Overview
Antidepressant Drugs: Tricyclics, SSRIs, and SNRIs