Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
Published on: February 20, 2021
FLASH effect tissue sparing comparison for X-ray, hadron, and VHEE irradiation modalities
Atia Ibrahimi1, Stefan Both2, Marc-Jan van Goethem2
1Particle Therapy Research Center (PARTREC), Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9747 AA, Groningen, The Netherlands. a.ibrahimi@umcg.nl.
Ultra-high dose rate radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) shows healthy tissue sparing. Less conformal modalities like X-rays and VHEE benefit more from FLASH, but require lower dose thresholds than hadrons for this effect.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Preclinical Research
Background:
- FLASH-RT utilizes ultra-high dose rates, demonstrating a promising healthy tissue sparing effect.
- Particle type influences dose deposition, potentially impacting the extent of FLASH-induced tissue sparing.
- Comparative studies on how different particle types affect FLASH sparing are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the impact of different irradiation modalities (X-rays, VHEE, hadrons) on healthy tissue sparing within the FLASH effect.
- To investigate how dose, dose-rate, and particle type influence the volume of healthy tissue benefiting from FLASH irradiation.
- To determine the dose and dose-rate thresholds required for FLASH effect achievement across different modalities.
Main Methods:
- Monte Carlo-based simulation study.
- Utilized a simple geometrical model to assess dose deposition characteristics.
- Compared X-rays, Very High Energy Electron (VHEE) beams, and hadron therapy under FLASH conditions.
Main Results:
- Less conformal modalities (X-rays, VHEE) showed greater benefit from the FLASH effect compared to hadrons.
- FLASH X-rays and FLASH VHEE deposited higher doses to healthy tissue than conventional hadrons.
- Hadrons required approximately double the target dose (20 Gy) and dose rate (75 Gy/s) for healthy tissue sparing compared to VHEE and X-rays.
Conclusions:
- The effectiveness of the FLASH effect is modality-dependent, with X-rays and VHEE showing more pronounced sparing under certain conditions.
- Current assumptions for FLASH-triggering dose and dose-rate thresholds may limit the application of highly fractionated treatments, particularly with hadron therapy.
- Future research should incorporate clinical dose distributions, multiple angles, fractionation, and RBE for more clinically relevant insights.
Related Concept Videos
X-ray Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Absorption of Radiation
Radiation: Applications
The average...
Biological Effects of Radiation
