Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Use of the Scissor-Type Knife During the Peroral Endoscopy Myotomy Procedure for the Treatment of Achalasia
Published on: March 3, 2023
Risk factors and predictive model for gas-related adverse events following peroral endoscopic myotomy
Zi-Han Geng1,2, Xin-Yang Liu3,4, Zhen Zhang3,4
1Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 FengLin Road, Shanghai, 200032, People's Republic of China. 15750585959@163.com.
Background And Aims:
Gas-related adverse events (GRAEs) are common after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Although air insufflation is a recognized risk factor, determinants of GRAEs in the era of carbon dioxide insufflation remain unclear. We aimed to identify independent risk factors after excluding air-insufflation cases and to develop and validate a clinically applicable prediction model.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 3965 consecutive patients who underwent POEM between 2011 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center. GRAEs were defined as pneumoperitoneum, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, or subcutaneous emphysema requiring intervention. Patients were randomly allocated to training (80%) and validation (20%) cohorts. Independent predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression in the training cohort. Model performance was evaluated in the validation cohort using discrimination (AUC) and calibration.
Results:
GRAEs occurred in 298 patients (7.5%). Multivariable analysis identified mucosal edema (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.33-2.89), tunnel length ≥ 13 cm (OR 2.75; 95% CI 1.95-3.94), selective myotomy (OR 11.81; 95% CI 8.63-16.18), and mucosal injury (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.74-3.62) as independent predictors (all P ≤ 0.001). Patients were stratified into low- (< 2 factors) and high-risk (≥ 2 factors) groups with significantly different GRAE rates. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC 0.763; 95% CI 0.732-0.794) and satisfactory calibration.
Conclusions:
We developed and internally validated a practical risk prediction model for GRAEs after POEM in the carbon dioxide era. This model may facilitate risk stratification and individualized perioperative management.
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Peptic Ulcer Disease I: Introduction
An acute ulcer, marked by superficial erosion and minimal inflammation, swiftly resolves upon identifying and addressing the underlying cause. In contrast, a chronic ulcer persists, potentially eroding through the muscular wall and forming fibrous tissue.
Peptic ulcers can also be...
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
Pyloric Obstruction
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations: