A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Physical Interventions Administered Orally for Infants

Vibhuti Shah1,2, Kaytlin Constantin3, Anna Taddio4,5,6

  • 1Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON.

Insights

Breastfeeding and sweet-tasting solutions effectively reduce infant distress during vaccine injections. These oral interventions offer significant comfort, making vaccinations a less stressful experience for babies.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Pain Management
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Infants frequently experience distress during routine vaccinations in their first year.
  • Repeated needle-stick pain can negatively impact infant well-being.
  • Effective, safe interventions are needed to mitigate vaccine-related distress.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review oral interventions for reducing infant distress during vaccinations.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of nutritive and non-nutritive oral methods.
  • To synthesize evidence on breastfeeding, sweet solutions, and non-nutritive sucking.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review using Cochrane methodology and GRADE.
  • Searched multiple databases for randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials.
  • Analyzed distress as the critical outcome, prioritizing placebo-controlled trials.

Main Results:

  • Fifty-nine studies were included, with evidence certainty ranging from moderate to very low.
  • Breastfeeding during vaccination significantly reduces distress (SMD=-2.38, moderate certainty).
  • Sweet-tasting solutions like sucrose and glucose also effectively reduce infant distress.

Conclusions:

  • Breastfeeding and sweet-tasting oral solutions are recommended for reducing infant vaccine distress.
  • These interventions provide a preferred, evidence-based approach to pain management.
  • Further research may clarify the effectiveness of non-nutritive sucking.
Abstract