Related Experiment Videos
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Writing: A Practical and Ethical Framework for Surgical Research and Publication
S R Thomson1, B A Bassett2, J E J Krige3
1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Background:
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming surgical research and medical publishing by changing how clinicians discover, evaluate, synthesize, and communicate scientific evidence. Despite widespread adoption, practical guidance on the responsible integration of AI into academic writing remains limited, particularly as large language models (LLMs) and emerging AI systems become increasingly sophisticated.
Methods:
This narrative review examines the contemporary AI ecosystem relevant to medical writing, including LLMs, retrieval-augmented systems, structured evidence extraction platforms, citation analytics tools, AI-enhanced academic databases, and emerging agentic AI systems. Current evidence relating to AI-assisted manuscript preparation, ethical considerations, governance, confidentiality, reproducibility, and scientific integrity was reviewed. A practical workflow integrating literature discovery, evidence extraction, synthesis, citation validation, and editorial refinement is proposed.
Results:
AI can substantially improve the efficiency, organization, clarity, and consistency of manuscript preparation while supporting evidence retrieval, synthesis, and editorial refinement. However, responsible use requires awareness of important limitations, including hallucinated references, publication bias amplification, confidentiality risks, language weighting, and the inability of current LLMs to distinguish reliably between truth and plausibility. The review also highlights the increasing integration of academic databases with AI-assisted retrieval and synthesis, together with the emergence of agentic research systems capable of performing increasingly complex scientific workflows under human supervision.
Conclusions:
AI should be regarded as an adjunct to, not a substitute for, scientific reasoning and scholarly judgment. When used transparently and under expert supervision, AI can enhance the quality and efficiency of medical writing while preserving the central intellectual responsibilities of authorship, interpretation, verification, and accountability. As AI systems become increasingly autonomous, maintaining rigorous human oversight will become progressively more important.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Non-equilibrium in the Cell