Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Establishment and Characterization of Three Afatinib-resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma PC-9 Cell Lines Developed with Increasing Doses of Afatinib
Published on: June 26, 2019
First-line third-generation EGFR-TKIs for advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and
Xiaomin Liu1, Qingfang Zhao1, Wei Sun1
1Department of Oncology, Capital Medical University Beijing Ditan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Background:
Head‑to‑head comparisons among first‑line third‑generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR‑mutated unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are nearly absent. This network meta‑analysis compares the efficacy and safety of all available agents and provide evidence-based references for clinical decision-making.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) from inception to April 2026. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC receiving first-line third-generation EGFR-TKIs compared with first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The primary efficacy outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) using a fixed-effect model and ranked treatments using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022349097).
Results:
Eleven RCTs comprising 4,663 patients were analyzed. All investigated third-generation agents (aumolertinib, osimertinib, furmonertinib, befotertinib, limertinib, rilertinib, lazertinib, and rezivertinib) demonstrated superior PFS compared to first-generation TKIs. However, no statistically significant PFS differences were observed among the third-generation agents. Similarly, no significant differences were found between third- and first-generation TKIs regarding objective response rate (ORR) or ≥ G3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant PFS benefit for befotertinib over first-generation TKIs in the L858R subgroup, nor for befotertinib or furmonertinib in elderly patients.
Conclusions:
Most third-generation TKIs offer superior PFS compared to first-generation agents, with comparable efficacy observed across the third-generation agents. Safety profiles, specifically regarding high-grade adverse events, appear similar between third- and first-generation TKIs.
Insights
Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Efficacy and safety are comparable among third-generation agents.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- First-line treatment for EGFR-mutated unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) often involves epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).
- Head-to-head comparisons of third-generation EGFR-TKIs are limited, necessitating a comprehensive analysis of available agents.
- This study addresses the need for evidence-based references in clinical decision-making for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of first-line third-generation EGFR-TKIs.
- To provide evidence-based references for clinical decision-making in EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
- To evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed across major databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL) up to April 2026.
- Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing first-line third-generation EGFR-TKIs with first-generation EGFR-TKIs in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC were included.
- Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted using a fixed-effect model, with treatment ranking based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).
Main Results:
- Eleven RCTs involving 4,663 patients were analyzed.
- All investigated third-generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated superior PFS compared to first-generation TKIs.
- No statistically significant differences in PFS, ORR, or ≥ G3 TEAEs were observed among third-generation agents or between third- and first-generation TKIs.
Conclusions:
- Most third-generation TKIs offer superior PFS over first-generation agents for EGFR-mutated NSCLC.
- Efficacy and safety profiles, particularly concerning high-grade adverse events, appear similar across third-generation TKIs.
- Subgroup analyses indicated no significant PFS benefit for specific agents (befotertinib, furmonertinib) in certain patient populations (L858R subgroup, elderly patients).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle

