Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats
05:34

A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats

Published on: May 20, 2019

Dynamic Versus Stable Fixation of Distal Tibiofibular Joint Injuries: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Functional Outcomes.

Leon Liu1, Pradith Santapur1, Taylor Checkley1

  • 1Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Cureus
|July 14, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A pilot randomized controlled trial protocol of overground robotic exoskeleton-assisted early ambulation after cardiovascular and thoracic surgery in the acute care setting (REACT-CVTS).

Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)·2026
Same author

Updated 2026 Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines for Facet Joint Interventions in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines.

Pain physician·2026
Same author

Management and Outcomes of Firework-Related Hand Blast Injuries: A Case Series on Surgical Decision-Making, Functional Preservation, and Psychosocial Recovery.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Little Fingers, Big Problems: Understanding Pediatric Trigger Fingers.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Necessity of Deltoid Ligament Repair in Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Cureus·2026
Same author

Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-Associated Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Rectosigmoid Colon: A Case Report and Literature Review of a Rare Malignancy.

Cureus·2026

Dynamic fixation for syndesmotic injuries shows potential for better functional outcomes and less pain than static fixation. However, high heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions, requiring larger studies for guideline recommendations.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Sports Medicine
  • Biomechanics

Background:

  • Syndesmotic injuries can lead to chronic instability, pain, and osteoarthritis.
  • Current management options include static screw fixation and dynamic suture button devices.
  • Dynamic fixation aims to preserve physiological joint micromotion, potentially improving outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials comparing dynamic and static fixation for syndesmotic injuries.
  • To evaluate the impact of fixation method on functional outcomes and postoperative pain.
  • To assess the overall evidence quality and identify areas for future research.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in PubMed and Google Scholar (June 2025).
Keywords:
dynamic fixationdynamic single screw fixationstable fixationtibio-fibular joint injurytibio-fibular syndesmosis

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats
05:34

A Mini-Invasive Internal Fixation Technique for Studying Immobilization-Induced Knee Flexion Contracture in Rats

Published on: May 20, 2019

  • Included 4 RCTs with 250 adult patients diagnosed with syndesmotic injuries.
  • Analyzed data using Covidence and RevMan 5.4.1, employing a random-effects model for pooled outcomes.
  • Main Results:

    • Dynamic fixation showed comparable American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores but significantly higher Olerud-Molander Ankle Scores (OMAS).
    • Patients undergoing dynamic fixation reported significantly lower Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores postoperatively.
    • Risk of bias was low to moderate, with incomplete blinding as a primary limitation.

    Conclusions:

    • Dynamic fixation may offer superior functional outcomes and reduced pain compared to static screw fixation for syndesmotic injuries.
    • Significant heterogeneity in pooled estimates, especially for AOFAS scores (I² = 96%), reduces confidence in findings.
    • Larger RCTs with standardized protocols are necessary to establish definitive conclusions and inform clinical guidelines.