Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Assay Development for High-Throughput Drug Screening Against Mycobacteria
Published on: October 25, 2024
Ceftaroline and ceftobiprole monotherapy for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections: a systematic review
Emanuele Rando1,2,3, Eugenia Magrini1, Flavio Sangiorgi1,4
1Dipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica - Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Background:
The comparative efficacy of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole against standard of care for Staphylococcus aureus infections, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus remains uncertain. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline and ceftobiprole monotherapy for non-urinary S. aureus infections.
Methods:
We registered the protocol in PROSPERO. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included randomized controlled trials and comparative non-randomized studies reporting adjusted estimates, enrolling patients with non-urinary S. aureus infections. The primary analysis assessed clinical cure in randomized trials using a Bayesian random-effects model with a vague prior. For ceftaroline, we additionally conducted an exploratory analysis using an observationally informed prior derived from non-randomized studies with variance inflation. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I and certainty of evidence with GRADE.
Results:
Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria [11 ceftaroline (1030 subjects); 5 ceftobiprole (1265 subjects)]. In the primary analysis, the pooled odds ratio for clinical cure was 1.38 (95% CrI 0.81-2.44) for ceftaroline and 0.99 (95% CrI 0.59-1.62) for ceftobiprole. The exploratory ceftaroline analysis using an observationally informed prior yielded an odds ratio of 1.45 (95% CrI 0.91-2.38). Adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between groups. Certainty of evidence was low for ceftaroline and moderate for ceftobiprole.
Conclusions:
Current evidence does not demonstrate superiority of ceftaroline or ceftobiprole over standard-of-care therapy for clinical cure in non-urinary S. aureus infections. Estimates remain imprecise and are largely driven by registrational trials and subgroup data. These findings support cautious, indication-specific interpretation rather than routine preference of these agents over established therapies.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Combined Effects of Drugs: Synergism
Such synergistic combinations...
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Staphylococcal Skin Infections