Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

Advanced Animal Model of Colorectal Metastasis in Liver: Imaging Techniques and Properties of Metastatic Clones
Published on: November 30, 2016
Automated model-based lesion tracking in CT: colorectal liver metastases as a use case for development and
Nalan Karunanayake1, Hao Yang1, Pengfei Geng1
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Objective:
To develop and evaluate an automated CT liver lesion-tracking algorithm that matches lesions over time, detects new metastases, and reports per‑lesion confidence to support response assessment.
Materials And Methods:
The study included 87 adults with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) who had baseline and 8-week follow-up contrast-enhanced CT. Three radiologists generated a consensus reference. We developed a machine learning-driven, automated model-based lesion tracking (Auto-MBT) that provides per-lesion matching confidence. Performance was compared with: (1) deformable registration + overlap; (2) deformable registration + Auto-MBT; and (3) affine registration + Auto-MBT. Analyses were stratified by lesion size (< 1 cm, 1-3 cm, overall) and count (≤ 5, 6-10, > 10 per scan), and the triage utility of confidence scores was assessed by blinded adjudication. A publicly available melanoma dataset was used for external testing.
Results:
On the CRLM test set (35 pairs), affine + Auto-MBT matched 458/464 lesions (precision/recall 99%), detected 28/30 new lesions (90%/93%), and identified 42/44 disappeared lesions (93%/96%). Overall matching F1 was 0.989; affine + Auto-MBT outperformed deformable + overlap (0.797) and deformable + Auto-MBT (0.959). Confidence scores were higher for radiologist-accepted matches than rejected matches (0.72 versus 0.54) supporting triage utility. On the external set (23 pairs), overall matching F1 was 0.994, affine + Auto-MBT outperformed deformable + overlap (0.768) and deformable + Auto-MBT (0.971).
Conclusion:
Auto-MBT accurately tracks CRLM and flags new lesions across sizes and counts, with per‑lesion confidence to triage, not replace, clinician review, enabling more comprehensive and accurate therapy response assessment.
Relevance Statement:
The automated tracking framework accurately matched liver lesions, including new and subcentimeter lesions, improving longitudinal assessment.
Key Points:
Manual tracking of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) on routine CT images is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. The algorithm demonstrates robust lesion‑level tracking performance (F1 > 0.9) in high lesion‑count CRLM, including matched, new, and disappeared lesions. Automated total-tumor tracking complements Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors‒RECIST by quantifying all lesions, extending evaluation beyond limited target metastases.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
07:15Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020