Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

A Sensitive and Specific Quantitation Method for Determination of Serum Cardiac Myosin Binding Protein-C by Electrochemiluminescence Immunoassay
Published on: August 8, 2013
Cardiac myosin-binding protein C in community-based patients with suspected heart failure
Kieran F Docherty1, Mark C Petrie1, Gemma McKinley2
1BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland G12 8TA, UK.
Insights
Adding cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C) to NT-proBNP testing improves heart failure (HF) diagnosis, particularly for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This biomarker combination aids in prioritizing echocardiography for suspected HF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarker Discovery
- Heart Failure Diagnostics
Background:
- Myocardial injury is a key indicator of heart failure (HF).
- The added diagnostic value of novel myocardial injury biomarkers, such as cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C), beyond natriuretic peptides in community patients with suspected HF remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the additive diagnostic value of established and novel myocardial injury biomarkers compared to natriuretic peptides in community patients with suspected HF.
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, and cMyBP-C alone and in combination for HF detection and classification.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre, prospective, observational study involving community patients with suspected HF and elevated NT-proBNP.
- Measurement of NT-proBNP, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), and cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C) from venous blood samples.
- Diagnostic accuracy evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for HF and HFrEF detection.
Main Results:
- The combination of NT-proBNP and cMyBP-C demonstrated the highest AUROC (0.77) for diagnosing HF versus no HF, outperforming NT-proBNP alone (0.74).
- For detecting HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the NT-proBNP and cMyBP-C combination yielded an AUROC of 0.90, compared to 0.85 for NT-proBNP alone.
- NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, and cMyBP-C levels were highest in patients with HFrEF.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C) measurement enhances the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP in patients with suspected heart failure.
- The addition of cMyBP-C provides significant value in identifying HFrEF.
- This biomarker combination may assist in prioritizing echocardiography for patients with suspected HF.
Introduction:
Myocardial injury is a hallmark of heart failure (HF). It is unknown whether established (e.g. troponin) or novel biomarkers of myocardial injury [e.g. cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C)] provide additive diagnostic value beyond natriuretic peptides in community patients with suspected HF.
Methods:
Community-based patients with suspected HF and elevated NT-proBNP levels were recruited into a multicentre, prospective, observational study at five sites (NCT04724200). Venous blood sampling was performed at the time of echocardiography. HF was classified according to left ventricular ejection fraction: HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) = ≤40%, HF with mildly reduced ejection (HFmrEF) = 41-49%, and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) = ≥50% with HFA-PEFF score ≥5. NT-proBNP (Roche Elecsys® assay), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT, Roche Elecsys® assay) and cMyBP-C (Roche precommercial assay) were measured. Diagnostic accuracy of each biomarker alone and in combination was examined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results:
Of 867 patients, 751 (87%) had measurable left ventricular ejection fraction and available biomarker data. Of these, 43 (6%) had HFrEF, 75 (10%) HFmrEF, and 278 (37%) HFpEF. NT-proBNP levels were highest in patients with HFrEF, with similar patterns observed for hsTnT and cMyBP-C. For the diagnosis of HF versus no HF, the combination of NT-proBNP and cMyBP-C had the highest AUROC of 0.77 (95%CI 0.73-0.80) versus NT-proBNP alone [0.74 (0.71-0.78); P = .003]. For detection of HFrEF versus no HF, the AUROC was 0.90 (0.86-0.95) for the combination of NT-proBNP and cMyBP-C compared with 0.85 (0.80-0.90) for NT-proBNP alone (P = .006).
Conclusion:
Measurement of cMyBP-C improved the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP in community-based patients with suspected HF, with greatest additive value for identifying HFrEF, and may help in the prioritization of echocardiography.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
