Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
A Simple Risk Assessment Tool for Older Adult Trauma Patients-Silver Trauma Score
Ambika Mukhi1, Sreenath Chalil Madathil2, Adam J Singer3
1Division of Trauma, Department of Surgery, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; School of Systems Sciences and Industrial Engineering, Watson Institute for Systems Excellence, Binghamton University, New York.
Introduction:
The recent American College of Surgeons Best Practice Guidelines emphasize greater sensitivity in geriatric trauma triage, which has led to a steep increase in trauma team activations. This underscores the need for accurate, easy-to-use prediction tools to guide early decision-making and triage.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 3897 hospitalized blunt trauma patients aged ≥ 65 y presenting directly to a Level 1 trauma center (2017-2023). Efficacy of the Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, quick sequential organ failure assessment, and early warning systems (national early warning score, modified early warning score, and rapid emergency medicine score) was assessed for predicting in-hospital mortality and emergency department (ED)-to-intensive care unit (ICU) disposition. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed with internal cross-validation. Based on these comparisons, two geriatric-specific models-the Silver Trauma Score (STS): STS-Mort and STS-ED-to-ICU-were derived from clinical variables available during the initial ED evaluation.
Results:
STS-Mort demonstrated the highest sensitivity and discrimination for mortality (sensitivity 0.85; area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-0.78), outperforming quick sequential organ failure assessment (sensitivity 0.57; AUC-ROC 0.70, 95% CI 0.68-0.71). For ED-to-ICU triage, STS-ED-to-ICU achieved the highest sensitivity: 0.83 and discrimination (AUC-ROC 0.80, 95% CI 0.80-0.80), exceeding Injury Severity Score (sensitivity 0.60; AUC-ROC 0.73, 95% CI 0.72-0.73). Univariate analysis showed mortality and ED-to-ICU rates increased with STS score.
Conclusions:
STS-Mort and STS-ED-to-ICU improved sensitivity for geriatric risk stratification. STS-Mort may serve as a general prognostic tool, whereas STS-ED-to-ICU reflects institutional geriatric triage practices and may require site-specific calibration. These models may support early resource allocation and reduce undertriage, with performance influenced by variability in ICU admission practices.
Related Concept Videos
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
