Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026
Testing a Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Training System for Optimal Electrode Array Placement in Different Inner Ear Anatomies
Published on: February 6, 2026
Deep learning for subtype classification of inner ear malformations on temporal bone HRCT: Development and
Xiaoge Li1, Xing Zhao2, Qianyu Hao3
1Senior Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital/State Key Laboratory of Hearing and Balance Science/National Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngologic Diseases/Key Laboratory of Hearing Science, Ministry of Education/Beijing Key Laboratory of Hearing Impairment Prevention and Treatment, Beijing 100048, China.
Purpose:
Accurate subtype classification of inner ear malformations (IEMs) on temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is important for preoperative risk assessment and surgical planning, but depends heavily on subspecialty expertise. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a deep learning model for multiclass IEM diagnosis on temporal bone HRCT.
Methods:
We developed and externally validated a weakly supervised deep learning framework for one-stage classification of automatically extracted temporal bone regions of interest from HRCT in a multicenter cohort of 9,182 ears (3,161 IEMs and 6,021 normal ears). The framework was based on an improved Transformer-based multiple instance learning architecture. Performance was evaluated on internal and independent external datasets. An independent reader study compared the model with five senior and five junior otolaryngologists. Explainability was assessed using attention-based slice ranking and Grad-CAM. The study was approved by an institutional review board, and informed consent was waived.
Results:
On the independent external test set, the proposed model demonstrated strong multiclass performance, with an accuracy of 93.9 % (95 % CI, 92.4 %-95.3 %), a macro-F1 score of 88.2 % (95 % CI, 84.3 %-91.4 %), and a multiclass AUC of 0.990 (95 % CI, 0.985-0.995). Performance was consistent on the internal validation set, with an accuracy of 96.5 % (95 % CI, 95.6 %-97.4 %), a macro-F1 score of 87.5 % (95 % CI, 83.0 %-91.0 %), and a multiclass AUC of 0.994 (95 % CI, 0.989-0.998). In the reader study, the model obtained an accuracy of 94.0 % and a macro-F1 score of 89.9 %, outperforming both senior otolaryngologists (mean macro-F1, 75.7 %, Holm-adjusted p = 0.0046) and junior otolaryngologists (mean macro-F1, 62.9 %, Holm-adjusted p < 0.001). The model also provided interpretable outputs by identifying the top three highest-contributing slices and generating Grad-CAM heatmaps.
Conclusion:
This weakly supervised framework enabled accurate and generalizable subtype-level diagnosis of IEMs on temporal bone HRCT in a large multicenter cohort and may serve as a practical decision-support tool for standardized preoperative assessment, particularly in settings with limited subspecialty expertise.
