Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Implementation of Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) for the Real-driving Emissions (RDE) Regulation in Europe
Published on: December 4, 2016
Qualitative testing of potential modifications to the EQ-HWB-9 in the United Kingdom
Tessa Peasgood1, Victoria Gale2, Aisha Moolla3
1Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. t.peasgood@sheffield.ac.uk.
Background:
The Experimental EQ Health and Wellbeing 9 (EQ-HWB-9) is a generic measure developed to assess the impact of health, social care and informal caregiving on quality of life. Several modifications have been proposed based on emerging evidence. This study aimed to assess the content validity of these modifications and user preferences.
Method:
Individuals with a long-standing physical or mental health condition or disability were invited from an online panel ensuring gender balance and age coverage. Two interviewers conducted semi-structured cognitive interviews to assess comprehensibility, relevance, and comprehensiveness of the modified experimental EQ-HWB-9 v1.2. Participants' views on differences between the modified and original experimental versions, as well as their preferences, were explored. Interviews were conducted via videoconferencing, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Framework analysis was used to code interviews, with themes drawn from the literature and data.
Results:
Twenty-six interviews were completed. Half the participants were female; participant age ranged from 24 to 68 years. Six of the nine items ('activities', 'exhausted', 'lonely', 'difficulty concentrating/thinking clearly', 'anxious', 'sad/depressed') were understood as intended by all participants. Some comprehension issues arose with the 'mobility' and 'pain_severity' items. Participants generally preferred the modified version, though a clear majority was not always observed. Justifications focused on item appropriateness, readability and distress.
Discussion And Conclusion:
As a generic measure, EQ-HWB-9 v1.2 performed well for comprehension, relevance and comprehensiveness. Modifications were well accepted and, except for the use of item stem, preferred over the original version. These findings will be combined with other international evidence to support finalising the instrument.
More Related Videos
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
14:09Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
Published on: March 21, 2013