From Molecular Pathophysiology to Clinical Trial Design in Sjögren's Disease: A Three-Axis Framework
Muhammad Soyfoo1, Julie Sarrand1, Christine Delporte2
1Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract:
Sjögren's disease (SjD) remains one of the few major systemic autoimmune diseases without an approved disease-modifying therapy, despite decades of pathogenic insight and several randomised trials. We contend that these repeated failures reflect not intrinsic therapeutic refractoriness, but trial designs insufficiently aligned with the underlying biological heterogeneity of SjD. We propose a tripartite framework in which SjD is organised around three dominant biological axes: an interferon-driven systemic axis, a B-cell/lymphoproliferative axis, and a symptom/fibro-structural axis. Each axis carries its own characteristic biomarkers, histopathology, prognostic features, candidate endpoints, and therapeutic targets, and each implies a distinct trial enrolment strategy. Recent positive trials-phase III for ianalumab in NEPTUNUS-1/2, phase 2b for iscalimab in TWINSS, phase 2 for nipocalimab in DAHLIAS, and phase 2 for dazodalibep in a phenotype-defined symptom-dominant cohort-illustrate that meaningful clinical benefit becomes detectable once stratification is aligned to biology. By integrating molecular endotypes, validated biomarkers, composite endpoints, and phenotype-matched therapies onto a single explicit architecture, SjD shifts from a recurring example of translational failure to a model for precision medicine in heterogeneous autoimmune disease. The central message is that SjD may be less intrinsically treatment-resistant than it has historically been treatment-mistargeted.
Insights
Sjögren
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Rheumatology
- Precision Medicine
Background:
- Sjögren's disease (SjD) lacks approved disease-modifying therapies despite extensive research.
- Past clinical trials have yielded limited success, potentially due to overlooking SjD's biological heterogeneity.
- Existing therapeutic strategies may be misaligned with the diverse pathogenic mechanisms within SjD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a novel framework for classifying Sjögren's disease based on dominant biological axes.
- To align trial designs and therapeutic strategies with specific SjD endotypes for improved outcomes.
- To reframe Sjögren's disease research towards a precision medicine approach.
Main Methods:
- Development of a tripartite framework organizing SjD into interferon-driven, B-cell/lymphoproliferative, and symptom/fibro-structural axes.
- Identification of characteristic biomarkers, histopathology, and prognostic features for each axis.
- Analysis of recent clinical trial designs and outcomes in relation to patient stratification.
Main Results:
- Recent trials employing phenotype-defined cohorts and targeted therapies show promising clinical benefits.
- Examples include positive results for ianalumab, iscalimab, nipocalimab, and dazodalibep in specific SjD subpopulations.
- Stratification aligned with biological axes enhances the detectability of meaningful clinical benefit.
Conclusions:
- Sjögren's disease may not be intrinsically treatment-resistant but rather treatment-mistargeted.
- A precision medicine approach, integrating molecular endotypes and phenotype-matched therapies, is crucial for SjD.
- The proposed tripartite framework offers a model for advancing therapeutic development in heterogeneous autoimmune diseases.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Clinical Trials: Overview
Autoimmune Disorders
Concept and Mechanism of Autoimmune Diseases
The immune system...
Parkinson Disease ll: Pathophysiology
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
Multiple Sclerosis l: Introduction

