Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Isolation, Characterization and MicroRNA-based Genetic Modification of Human Dental Follicle Stem Cells
Published on: November 16, 2018
Effects of Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Coated PRF on Gingiva-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells: In Vitro Study
İzzet Melih Gürkan1, Bahar Demir Cevizlidere2, Seçil Çalişkan3
1Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir 26140, Türkiye.
Nano-hydroxyapatite platelet-rich fibrin (HA-PRF) shows comparable cell viability and biologic responses to leukocyte platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF), suggesting HA-PRF is a promising alternative for regenerative dentistry applications.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Stem Cell Biology
- Regenerative Dentistry
Background:
- Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is utilized in regenerative dentistry for tissue support.
- PRF preparation modifications, including tube surface characteristics, influence its biological activity.
- Investigating novel PRF formulations like nano-hydroxyapatite PRF (HA-PRF) is crucial for optimizing regenerative potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the in vitro effects of HA-PRF on gingiva-derived mesenchymal stem cells (GMSCs).
- To compare HA-PRF with leukocyte PRF (L-PRF) and titanium PRF (T-PRF) in terms of cellular response.
- To assess cell viability, apoptosis, necrosis, growth factor release, and cytokine gene expression.
Main Methods:
- GMSCs were isolated and cultured with PRF membranes prepared from glass (L-PRF), nano-hydroxyapatite (HA-PRF), and titanium (T-PRF) tubes.
- Cell viability assessed via MTT assay.
- Apoptosis/necrosis evaluated by Annexin V/PI flow cytometry; VEGF, TGF-β1 by ELISA; and IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α gene expression by qRT-PCR.
Main Results:
- HA-PRF and L-PRF groups exhibited higher cell viability than T-PRF on day 7.
- No significant differences in apoptosis or necrosis rates were observed among the groups.
- All PRF types showed time-dependent release of growth factors and altered cytokine gene expression.
Conclusions:
- HA-PRF demonstrates no cytotoxicity and comparable biologic responses to L-PRF.
- Both HA-PRF and L-PRF show more favorable cellular responses than T-PRF.
- HA-PRF presents a viable alternative to L-PRF for regenerative applications in dentistry.
More Related Videos
06:47Isolation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Human Alveolar Periosteum and Effects of Vitamin D on Osteogenic Activity of Periosteum-derived Cells
Published on: May 4, 2018
07:14Synthesis of Graphene-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites for Potential Use in Bone Tissue Engineering
Published on: July 27, 2022